Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mukesh Hariprasad Agrawal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

Rekha Patil                                     1/3                      915-ABA-1855-2019.doc



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1855 OF 2019

              Mukesh Hariprasad Agrawal                                      ...Applicant
                  Versus
              The State of Maharashtra                                       ...Respondent

              Mr. Amrendra Mishra, for the Applicant.
              Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.


                                              CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                              DATE : 23rd August, 2019

              P.C. :


              1.             Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



              2.             By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

              connection with C.R. No 221 of 2019, registered with the Kasturba Marg

              Police Station, Mumbai,           for the alleged offences punishable under

              Sections 143, 147, 149, 441, 452, 323, 504, 507, 427 of the Indian Penal

              Code.



              3.             Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the complaint is




               ::: Uploaded on - 27/08/2019                    ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2019 04:16:59 :::
 Rekha Patil                                   2/3                        915-ABA-1855-2019.doc


              lodged by the daughter-in-law of the watchman-Arjun Patel, who is

              claiming a room in a plot, purchased by the Applicant. Learned counsel for

              the applicant submits that as the building on the said plot was dilapidated,

              an Order under Section 354 of the MMC Act was passed and the building

              was demolished. He submits that pursuant to the said order under Section

              354, the complainant's father-in-law's room, where he was residing as a

              watchman, was also demolished.          Learned Counsel submits that Arjun

              Patel, who was working as a watchman in said premises had no right, title

              and interest in the said room. He further submits that except section 452 of

              the IPC, all other sections are bailable.



              4.             Learned APP to file an affidavit setting out the complicity of

              the applicant.



              5.             In the meantime, till the next date,   the applicant is granted

              interim protection on the following terms and conditions :-

                                                    ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one or two ::: Uploaded on - 27/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2019 04:16:59 ::: Rekha Patil 3/3 915-ABA-1855-2019.doc sureties in the like amount ;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on 3rd September, 2019 and 4th September, 2019 between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon, and thereafter as and when called;

6. Stand over to 24th September, 2019. To be listed on the Supplementary Board.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

( REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ) ::: Uploaded on - 27/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2019 04:16:59 :::