Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Muthukrishnan vs S.Veeramani on 14 August, 2013

Bench: M.Jaichandren, M.M.Sundresh

       

  

  

 
 
 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated: 14.08.2013

Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren
and
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.M.Sundresh

O.S.A.Nos.288 and 289 of 2013


1.R.Muthukrishnan
2.R.Selvakumari					.. Appellants

		vs.

1.S.Veeramani
2.K.R.Purushothaman

3.The Commissioner,
  Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment,
  Chennai-34.

4.The Sub-Registrar of Virugambakkam,
  Chennai-92.					.. Respondents





PRAYER: Appeals are filed under Order 36, Rule 11 of O.S. Rules, r/w. Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the common order dated 11.7.2013 in O.A.Nos.479 and 480 of 2013 in C.S.No.432 of 2013.

-----
			For appellants	:	Mr.G.Murugendran
-----

J U D G M E N T

[Judgment of the Court was made by M.M.Sundresh, J.] These two Original Side Appeals have been preferred by the appellants, being aggrieved against the order passed by the learned single Judge, in O.A.Nos.479 and 480 of 2013 in C.S.No.432 of 2013, dated 11.7.2013.

2. We have perused the order passed by the learned single Judge. The learned single Judge, after passing orders, issued notice to respondents/appellants. Therefore, it is clear that the learned single Judge has not passed any final order in the Applications in O.A.Nos.479 and 480 of 2013. In such circumstances, the appellants ought to have filed appropriate applications seeking to set aside, vary or modify the order passed by the learned single Judge, instead, the appellants are before us. In such view of the matter, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeals are dismissed. However, liberty is given to the appellants to file appropriate applications before the learned single Judge, seeking to set aside, vary or modify the orders passed by the learned single Judge, on 11.7.2013. No costs. M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 are closed.

gs To

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment, Chennai-34.

2.The Sub-Registrar of Virugambakkam, Chennai 92