Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

P.P.Ashique vs The Authorized Officer on 25 August, 2021

Author: A.M.Badar

Bench: A.M.Badar

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
     WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 3RD BHADRA, 1943
                     OP (DRT) NO. 107 OF 2021
              AGAINST THE PROCEEDINGS IN SA 69/2021
              OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS/APPLICANTS 2 AND 3:

    1      P.P.ASHIQUE
           AGED 50 YEARS
           S/O. P.P.KOYA, PONNAMPARAMBATH HOUSE,
           KONAD BEACH, WEST HILL P.O., KOZHIKODE-673005.
    2      SHAMEENA P.P.,
           AGED 44 YEARS
           W/O. P.P.ASHIQUE, PONNAMPARAMBATH HOUSE, KONAD BEACH,
           WEST HILL P.O., KOZHIKODE-673005.
           BY ADV V.K.PEER MOHAMED KHAN


RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT AND 1ST APPLICANT:

    1      THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
           DHANALAXMI BANK LTD., INDUSTRIAL FINANCE BRANCH-
           ERNAKULAM, MINI ENCLAVE, DOOR NO.40/9036A, B,
           YMCA JUNCTION, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682011.
    2      M/S. PLATINO CLASSIC MOTORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,
           DOOR NO.11/6B, NH-47, AROOR BYPASS ROAD, MARADU P.O.,
           ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY MR.SATHIQ BUHARI,
           RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL.
           BY ADVS.
           SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN,STANDING COUNSEL,
           DHANALAKSHMI B
           NAGARAJ NARAYANAN



     THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 25.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP(DRT) NO.107 OF 2021
                                         2



                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of August 2021 Petitioners were constrained to approach this Court as the Debt Recovery Tribunal at Ernakulam was not functioning due to non sitting of the Tribunal. Now it is reported that the Tribunal has started functioning.

2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for petitioners submitted that the application for amendment at Exhibit P3 and stay petition at Exhibit P4 are listed for hearing before the said Tribunal on 31-08-2021.

3. This Court has already granted interim relief to petitioners in the wake of the fact that the Debt Recovery Tribunal was not functioning.

In this view of the matter, as the Tribunal started functioning, the original petition is ordered by directing the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam to decide the application for amendment at Exhibit P3 and stay petition at Exhibit P4 OP(DRT) NO.107 OF 2021 3 expeditiously and till disposal of those applications, the interim relief granted by this Court in the instant petition shall continue to operate.

Sd/-

A.M.BADAR JUDGE SSK/25/08 OP(DRT) NO.107 OF 2021 4 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SECURITIZATION APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN SA NO.69/2021 BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, ERNAKULAM WITHOUT ANNEXURES.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BANK, WITHOUT ANNEXURES. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDMENT PETITION FILED UNDER ID NO.6368/2021 IN SA NO.69/2021 BEFORE THE DRT-I ERNAKULAM.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION AS PER ID NO.6370/2021 IN SA NO.69/2021 ON THE FILES OF DRT-I ERNAKULAM.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DRT-I ERNAKULAM.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL


SSK                //TRUE COPY//                PA TO JUDGE