Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Viram Aahir & 4 vs State Of Gujarat & 7 on 28 February, 2014

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

         C/SCA/3235/2014                                               ORDER




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3235 of 2014

================================================================
                    VIRAM AAHIR & 4....Petitioner(s)
                               Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT & 7....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DV BHAVSAR, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 - 5
MR JANAK RAVAL ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

                                Date : 28/02/2014


                                  ORAL ORDER

1.0 By way  of present  petition  under  Articles  14,  19 and 21 of the  Constitution of Indian, the petitioners have prayed as under:

9.(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition in   the interest of justice (B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus   or in the nature of writ of Mandamus  or any appropriate  writ,   order   or   direction   to   respondent   authorities   to   remove   the   encroachments   on   Gaucher   land   i.e.   the   Chariyan   Vistar   of   northern   area   of   Banni   Vistar   of   Village   Samarasar­shekh,   Taluka:   Bhuj,   District:   Kutch   and   also   to   prevent   any   further   encroachment   on   this   land   in   future   in   the   interest   of   justice   and/of direct to respondent authorities to make cement wall on   Page 1 of 3 C/SCA/3235/2014 ORDER surrounding the Gaucher land with all water and drainage and   other security in the interest of justice (C) Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondents   to remove the encroachment on the Gaucher land of the village   Samarasar­shekh   as   per   the   earlier   direction   of   the   learned   Collector   with  a police  protection  and  the  report   of  the  same   action   may   be   placed   before   this   Hon'ble   Court   within   a   stipulated time of one month from the order;

(D) Your Lordships may be pleased to pass an order to file a   report of encroachment of village every three months/quarterly   direct   the   Collector   and   the   Collector   has   to   take   action   and   remove those encroachment  within next three months  without   fail in the interest of justice (E) Any   other   and   further   reliefs   may   be   granted   as   the   circumstances and as per the fact of the case may require. 

2.0 It is the case of the petitioners that certain almighty persons have  encroached   the   gauchar   land   of   Village"   Samarasar­Shekh,   Taluka: 

Bhuj,   District:   Kutch   and   therefore,   a   writ   petition   being   Special   Civil  Application No. 14612 of 2012 has been preferred before this Court  by  the petitioners. Vide order dated 23.10.2012, this Court has directed the  concerned authority to look into the matter. At that time encroachments  were removed from the said gauchar land however, subsequently again  they have encroached  the land. Therefore,  the petitioners have made  applications on 14.10.2013  and 18.11.2013  respectively. However,  no  steps have been taken by the Collector, Bhuj­Kutch. 

3.0 Considering  the facts and circumstances  of the case and order  Page 2 of 3 C/SCA/3235/2014 ORDER dated 23.10.2012 passed by this Court in Special Civil Application No.  14612 of 2012, the Collector, Bhuj;Kutch is hereby directed to look into  the matter and take appropriate steps which shall permanently resolve  the question involved in the matter. The  Collector, Bhuj­Kutch shall take  appropriate   steps   in   accordance   with   law   pursuant   to   the  representations made by the petitioners on 14.10.2013 and 18.11.2013  within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the order. 

4.0 In   view   of   the   aforesaid   direction,   learned   advocate   for   the  petitioner   does   not   press   this   petition   and   sought   permission   for  withdrawal  of the same. Permission  as prayed for is granted. Petition  stands disposed of as withdrawn.  Direct service is permitted.

(A.J.DESAI, J.) niru* Page 3 of 3