Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Dbl Nidagatta Mysore Highways Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 13 June, 2025

Author: B M Shyam Prasad

Bench: B M Shyam Prasad

                                       -1-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC:20354
                                               WP No. 23405 of 2023


              HC-KAR




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                  DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                 BEFORE
              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
                  WRIT PETITION NO. 23405 OF 2023 (T-RES)
             BETWEEN:

             1.   DBL NIDAGATTA MYSORE HIGHWAYS PVT LTD.,
                  A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
                  COMPANIES ACT 2013
                  HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                  77, 5TH STAGE,
                  BEHIND RMP QUARTERS,
                  KUVEMPUNAGAR,
                  MYSURU-570023
                  REPRESENTED BY ITS
                  AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
                  KOMAL GAYAKWAD.
                                                  ...PETITIONER
Digitally    (BY SRI. BHARAT B. RAICHANDANI, ADVOCATE)
signed by
VANAMALA     AND:
N
Location:
High Court   1.   UNION OF INDIA
of                THROUGH THE SECRETARY,
Karnataka
                  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
                  MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
                  NORTH BLOCK,
                  NEW DELHI-110001.

             2.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
                  THROUGH THE SECRETARY,
                           -2-
                                     NC: 2025:KHC:20354
                                   WP No. 23405 of 2023


 HC-KAR



     COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT,
     COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE-1,
     FIRST MAIN ROAD,
     GANDHINAGAR,
     BANGALORE-560009

3.   ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
     COMMERCIAL TAXES
     LOCAL GOODS AND SERVICE
     TAXES-206, NO.119,
     AVANI ARCADE, A BLOCK,
     VIJAYANAGARA 3RD STAGE,
     MYSURU-570030

4.   THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF
     COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS)
     LOCAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX,
     MYSURU-570030

5.   ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CGST
     OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
     CENTRAL TAX GST COMMISSIONERATE,
     MYSURU
     S1 AND S2, VINAYA MARGA,
     SIDDHARTHA NAGAR,
     MYSURU-570011

6.   THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS)
     CENTRAL TAX,
     S1 AND S2, GST COMMISSIONERATE,
     2ND FLOOR, VINAY MARGA,
     SIDHARTH NAGAR, MYSURU-570011

7.   STATE BANK OF INDIA
     THROUGH THE MANAGER,
     GROUND FLOOR, LHO BUILDING,
     HOSHANGABAD ROAD,
                                -3-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:20354
                                           WP No. 23405 of 2023


HC-KAR



    (IFSC CODE S8IN0001920)
    BHOPAL M P 462001
                                  ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1;
    SRI. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R2 TO R4;
    SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R5
AND R6;
    SRI. VIGNESH S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R7)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
AND THE SET ASIDE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED
05/10/2023 BEARING NO.ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYS/CTI-
1/ /2023-24 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY R3; ISSUE
DIRECTION    UNDER     ARTICLE   226   OF   THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA QUASHING AND SETTING
ASIDE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 18.08.2023
ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYS/CT3/ / 2023-24 (ANNEXURE-J),
AS AMENDED VIDE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED
26/09/2023 BEARING NO.ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYSCTI/
/2023-24 (ANNEXURE-M) ISSUED BY R3.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD


                    ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 05.10.2023 issued in Form GST DRC-13 under Rule 145(1) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Rule 2017 calling upon it to pay a sum of Rs.2,91,98,895/-, and it is stated that this amount is towards the interest on the amount in demand. -4-

NC: 2025:KHC:20354 WP No. 23405 of 2023 HC-KAR It is undisputed that the petitioner has availed appellate remedy and that the petitioner would be entitled to stay of the proceedings if there is a 10% deposit. The appeal is admitted. Crucially, it is not disputed that the petitioner has deposited the entire demand in a sum of Rs.14,72,85,748/-, subject to the outcome of the appeal. These are overwhelming circumstances and the impugned notice dated 05.10.2023 by the third respondent will have to yield subject to the final decision in the pending appeal.

The petition is allowed accordingly.

Sd/-

(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB