Punjab-Haryana High Court
Haryana State Pollution Control Board vs Ashok Tuli on 1 December, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(i) Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 01st December, 2016
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Ashok Tuli
...... Respondent
(ii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1110-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Rajesh Chand Vats
...... Respondent
(ii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1111-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Sunita Luthra
...... Respondent
(iv) Criminal Misc.No.A-1122-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
PPN Properties Pvt. Ltd.
...... Respondent
(v) Criminal Misc.No.A-1125-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Anita Badhwar and others
...... Respondents
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016
and 21 more.
1 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:25 :::
Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -2-
(vi) Criminal Misc.No.A-1131-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Guneet Dhillon and others
...... Respondents
(vii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1132-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
J.L.Khanna and others
...... Respondents
(viii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1133-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Arun Sharma and others
...... Respondents
(ix) Criminal Misc.No.A-1135-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Madhu Chawla
...... Respondent
(x) Criminal Misc.No.A-1145-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Shiv Mohan Mehra
...... Respondent
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016
and 21 more.
2 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 :::
Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -3-
(xi) Criminal Misc.No.A-1147-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Anita Suhag and others
...... Respondents
(xii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1149-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Anil Luthra
...... Respondent
(xiii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1150-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Gulshan Rai Jain
...... Respondent
(xiv) Criminal Misc.No.A-1151-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Sanjay Mittal
...... Respondent
(xv) Criminal Misc.No.A-1153-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Raj R.Gupta
...... Respondent
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016
and 21 more.
3 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 :::
Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -4-
(xvi) Criminal Misc.No.A-1154-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Ritu Lekhi and another
...... Respondents
(xvii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1160-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Lt. Col. Krishan Kumar Chabra and others
...... Respondents
(xviii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1161-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Sharad Mohan and another
...... Respondents
(xix) Criminal Misc.No.A-1162-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Pushpa Pangtey and others
...... Respondents
(xx) Criminal Misc.No.A-1164-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Gulshan Rai Jain
...... Respondent
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016
and 21 more.
4 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 :::
Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -5-
(xxi) Criminal Misc.No.A-1168-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Jeewan Mohan
...... Respondent
(xxii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1173-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Pushpa Pangey and others
...... Respondent
(xxiii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1176-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Sushil Gupta
...... Respondent
(xxiv) Criminal Misc.No.A-1177-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
C.P.Kukreja Associates Ltd.
...... Respondent
(xxv) Criminal Misc.No.A-1178-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Anita Suhag and others
...... Respondents
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016
and 21 more.
5 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 :::
Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -6-
(xxvi) Criminal Misc.No.A-1179-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Namita Mehta
...... Respondent
(xvii) Criminal Misc.No.A-1180-MA of 2016 (O&M)
Haryana State Pollution Control Board
...... Petitioner
Versus
Rajiv Singh
...... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
***
Present : Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate
for the applicants.
***
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
These are all the applications for grant of leave to file an appeal against the judgment of acquittal and the relevant facts are taken from Criminal Misc.No.A-1135-MA of 2016. The other cases are similar cases only with the distinction that there are applications for condonation of delay of different periods and they all are being decided in terms of the decision in Criminal Misc.No.A-1135-MA of 2016.
The applicant-Board had launched prosecution under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 (in short 'the Act) against the respondent on the ground that she had unauthorizedly constructed a farm house in an area which was covered by notification dated 07.05.1992. The learned trial For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016 and 21 more.
6 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 ::: Criminal Misc.No.A-1109-MA of 2016 (O&M) -7- Court, however, held that the version of the respondent is that they had purchased built up farm houses which as per the revenue record were shown to be existing prior to the notification dated 07.05.1992 and consequently on the date of notification, the land was not 'Gair Mumkin Pahar'.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that there is some material to show that this finding may not be fully correct. It cannot be lost sight that the penalty under the Act is very stiff and a person can be sentenced for five year imprisonment.
In these circumstances, it would be incumbent upon the Board to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and merely because the two views may be possible and an order of finding of conviction cannot be returned.
Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. In other cases also, the prayer for condonation of delay is allowed but the applications for leave to file an appeal against the judgment of acquittal are dismissed as the counsel has accepted that the findings in one case would be applicable in other cases.
( AJAY TEWARI )
st
01 December, 2016 JUDGE
mamta
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
For Subsequent orders see CRM-A-1110-MA-2016, CRM-A-1111-MA-2016, CRM-A-1122-MA-2016 and 21 more.
7 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 03-12-2016 20:31:26 :::