Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Kerala High Court

Anoop Skaria vs A.J.D'Cruz on 25 February, 2016

Author: P.B.Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

   THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/6TH PHALGUNA, 1937

                     SA.No. 577 of 2001 (B)
                     -----------------------

            AS 86/1999 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOCHI
         OS 568/1997 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOCHI
                              .....

APPELLANT/APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
----------------------------------

  1.       ANOOP SKARIA, AGED 41 YEARS,
           S/O.ALEXANDER SKARIA,
           CC 1/440, FORT COCHIN,
           COCHIN - 682 001.


            BY ADVS. SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL
                     SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & 2ND DEFENDANT:
----------------------------------------------------

  1.       A.J.D'CRUZ, AGED 72 YEARS,
           S/O.LATE SAMUEL MACMILLAN D'CRUZ,
           CC 1/441, BURGHER STREET,
           FORT COCHIN, COCHIN - 682 001.

  2.       THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
           CORPORATION BUILDING, ERNAKULAM,
           KOCHI - 682 011.


            R1 BY ADV. SMT.V.A.KASTHURI
            R2 BY ADVS. SRI.V.M.KURIAN (JR.)
                        SRI.K.ANAND, SC

       THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
       ON 25-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
       THE FOLLOWING:



msv/

                  P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
              -----------------------------------
                    S.A.No.577 of 2001
        ------------------------------------------------
        Dated this the 25th day of February, 2016


                         JUDGMENT

There is no representation for the appellant. The appeal, in the circumstance, is dismissed for default.

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

smm