Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad

Shri Vijay D. Patel,, Ahmedabad vs The Cit-7,, Ahmedabad on 1 March, 2018

      आयकर अपील	य अ
धकरण, अहमदाबाद  यायपीठ - अहमदाबाद ।

           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   AHMEDABAD - BENCH 'A'

       BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                          AND
      SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

               आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.2022/Ahd/2015
                   नधा रण वष /Asstt. Year: 2008-2009

    Vijay D. Patel                        Vs. CIT-7
    Prop. M/s.Paras Bullion                   Ahmedabad.
    T-1, Saundarya Apartment
    Vibhag-2
    Bhuyandev, Ghalodia
    Ahmedabad 380 061.

    PAN : AGQPP 0895 G


    अपीलाथ / (Appellant)                    तयथ 
                                             ् / (Respondent)


   Assessee by        :              None
   Revenue by         :              Shri S.K. Dev, Sr.R

         सन
          ु वाई क तार	ख/Date of Hearing        :   27/02/2018
         घोषणा क तार	ख /Date of Pronouncement:     01/03/2018



                           आदे श/O R D E R


PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This is assessee's appeal directed against order of ld.CIT-7, Ahmedabad dated 10.3.2015 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Asstt.Year 2008-09.

ITA No.2022 /Ahd/2015 2

2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. Notice of hearing was sent to the assessee through RPAD post. The same was returned by the postal authorities with remark "left". Assessee has not intimated to the Registry about change address if any. Nor any intimation has been sent to the Registry for its non- appearance on the date of hearing. In view of this, it is presumed that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal before the Tribunal, therefore, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed for want of prosecution following decision of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in CIT Vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Delhi).

Order pronounced in the Court on 1st March, 2018.

     Sd/-                                                Sd/-
(PRADIPKUMAR KEDIA)                                   (RAJPAL YADAV)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                   JUDICIAL MEMBER