Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Substances Act vs In Re : Lokenath Pramanick on 24 December, 2021

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

24.12.2021
   60
Ct. No 29
KAUSHIK
(rejected)
                                  C.R.M. 7312 of 2021

             In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
             Criminal Procedure in connection with NCB Crime No.
             01/CL/NDPS/P&I/WB/2013 dated 09.05.2013 under Sections
             22(b)(ii)(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
             Substances Act,1985.

                                     And

             In Re : Lokenath Pramanick                      ..... petitioner



                        Mr. A.Chakraborty
                        Mr. D.Kar
                        Mr. H.Mustafi
                                                 ... for the petitioner

                        Mr. Vipul Kundalia
                        Ms. Aishwarya Rajyashree
                        Ms. Sammriddhi Majumdar
                        Mr. Anurag Roy
                                                ... for the respondent no.1.

Petitioners seeks parity with the co-accused, who was granted bail in CRM 414 of 2020 on January 14, 2020.

Learned advocate appearing for the Customs Authority submits that, the person who was granted bail subsequently did not complied with the conditions of bail leading to the cancellation of such bail by the order dated February 5, 2020 by the Jurisdictional Court.

As the bail of the co-accused is cancelled, we are of the view that the petitioner cannot claim parity with that co- accused. In any event, commercial quantity of narcotic was seized from the joint possession of the petitioner, we are of the view that the petitioner is unable to overcome the restrictions 2 under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Consequently, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected and the application being CRM 7312 of 2021 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)