Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Hakimuddin Bhemat vs Supreme Sales Agency on 16 March, 2020

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

OC - 15


                                  ORDER SHEET
                                 GA 2636 of 2019
                                        With
                                  CS 253 of 2019
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                         Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                  ORIGINAL SIDE


                             HAKIMUDDIN BHEMAT
                                   Versus
                            SUPREME SALES AGENCY


   BEFORE:
   The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Date : 16th March, 2020.

For Plaintiff : Mr. A. Farmania, Adv.

For Defendant : Mr. S. Basu, Adv.

Mr. T. Roy, Adv.

                                                                     Ms. K. Sinha,    Adv.
                                                                       Mr. A. Dhar,   Adv.




The Court : The application is taken up for final hearing. In a suit for infringement, copyright and passing off interim order was granted in favour of the plaintiff on December 4, 2019. On December 4, 2019 orders in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the petition were granted. An advocate was appointed as Receiver to make an inventory in terms of prayer (d) of the petition. Learned Receiver acted in terms of such order, made inventory and submitted his report.

2

The plaintiff is manufacturing products used for spraying water, fertilizer, pesticides and other liquids. The plaintiff possesses copy right of the artistic work of the infringed label. The plaintiff uses the word " Bharat Shakti" in the label.

Learned Advocate appearing for the defendant submits that the defendant will market its product by substituting the words "Bharat Supreme Shakti" with "SSG Bharat". The plaintiff has no objections to such conduct.

The words that the defendant proposes to use to market its product, namely, "SSG Bharat" being dissimilar to the ones and the plaintiff not objecting thereto, used by the plaintiff, it would be appropriate to modify the subsisting interim order to permit the defendant to use the word " SSG Bharat" to market its products.

Old GA No.2636 of 2019, new GA No.1 of 2019 in CS No.253 of 2019 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

(DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) S.De