Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 vs M/S. Bengal Greenfield Housing ... on 18 November, 2021

Author: T.S. Sivagnanam

Bench: T.S. Sivagnanam, Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

OD-8&9

                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
               SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)
                         ORIGINAL SIDE


                       ITAT/100/2017
            IA NO: GA/2/2017(Old No.GA/843/2017)
     PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA
                          VERSUS
M/S. BENGAL GREENFIELD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO. LIMITED

                       ITAT/100/2017
            IA NO: GA/1/2017(Old No.GA/842/2017)
     PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA
                          VERSUS
M/S. BENGAL GREENFIELD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO. LIMITED


BEFORE :

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
         And
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Date : 18th November, 2021


                                    Appearance:-

                                Mr. Arunava Ganguly, Adv.
                                                ... For Appellant



      The Court : We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the appellant/revenue and the learned Counsel appearing for the

respondent/assessee. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in

the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being GA/1/2017 is allowed. 2

This appeal of revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the `Act' in brevity) is directed against the order dated 3rd February, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "B" Bench, Kolkata (the `Tribunal') in ITA No. 1413/Kol/2011 for the assessment year 2006-07.

It is submitted by the learned Counsel on either side that the appeal is below the tax effect stipulated by the CBDT. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. The substantial questions of law are left open.

With the dismissal of the appeal, all connected applications are accordingly dismissed.

(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) SN/S.Das AR(CR)