Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam

D.Sundararajan vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 19 September, 2012

      

  

  

                  CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                              ERNAKULAM BENCH

                          O.A. NO. 206 OF 2012

             Wednesday, this the 19th day of September,    2012

CORAM:
          HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
          HON'BLE Mr. K.GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

D.Sundararajan
Senior Technician
Signal and Telecommunications Department
anguneri Railway Station and Post Nanguneri
Residing at Railway Quarters No.2A, Nanguneri
Thirunelveli District - 627 108                   ...     Applicant

(By Advocate Mr. TCG Swamy )

                                versus

1.        Union of India represented by the General manager
          Southern Railway
          Headquarters Office, Park Town PO
          Chennai - 3

2.        The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer
          Southern Railway, Trivandrum Division
          Trivandrum - 14

3.        The Senior Divisional Signal
          and Telecommunications Engineer
          Southern Railway, Trivandrum Division
          Trivandrum - 14                         ...     Respondents

(By Advocate Mr.P.Haridas       )

          The application      having been heard on 19.09.2012, the Tribunal
on the same day delivered the following:

                                   O R D E R

HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER The applicant is presently working as Senior Technician in the Signal and Telecommunications Department of Southern Railway, Trivandrum Division. In connection with the disciplinary action he was suspended from service with effect from 27.07.1985 to 16.03.1988. Eventually, the charges framed against the applicant was found unjustified and further action stood dropped. However, the suspension period was not regularized. The applicant in the circumstances prays the following reliefs:

(i) "Declare that the applicant is entitled to have the period of suspension from 27.07.1985 to 16.03.1988 treated as duty for all purposes with all consequential benefits arising therefrom;
(ii) Direct the respondents to treat the period of suspension from 27.07.1985 to 16.03.1988 as duty for all purposes and direct further to grant the consequential benefits arising therefrom."

2. In the reply statement filed by the respondents it is stated that the prayer for regularizing the period of suspension from 27.07.1985 to 16.03.1988 treated as duty for all purposes with all consequential benefits arising therefrom has been under active consideration of the respondents. On going through the records, the Senior Divisional Signal & Telecommunications Engineer, Southern Railway, Trivandrum, the 3rd respondent has passed suitable orders entitling full pay and allowances during the period of suspension i.e 27.07.1985 to 16.03.1988. A true copy of the order is produced as Annexure R-1. It is also stated that further action for re fixation of pay and allowing consequential benefits be paid to the applicant immediately.

3. In the above circumstances, substantial relief as prayed for in the OA has since been satisfied by passing Annexure R-1 order. There remains no issue for adjudication. As assured, fixation of pay and allowances and consequential benefits be calculated and paid following Annexure R-1 order without delay, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. OA is disposed of as above. No costs.

Dated, the 19th September, 2012.

K GEORGE JOSEPH                           JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER                      JUDICIAL MEMBER




vs