Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Jay Prakash Gupta vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 11 October, 2013

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                    Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002477
 
Appellant /Complainant         :      Shri J.P. Gupta, Basti (Not 
present)
                               Represented by Sh. Vinod Kumar & Sh. 
Rajesh Singh
Public Authority               :      LIC of India, Mumbai 
(Maharashtra) 
                               (Ms Malika Prasad, Ms Geeta 
Prabhakaran, Ms Seema
                               Sharma - through videoconferencing)

Date of Hearing                :      11 October  2013
 
Date of Decision               :      11 October  2013 
  
Facts:­ 

1.          Appellant submitted RTI application dated 04 April  2012   before   the   CPIO,   LIC   of   India,   Central   Office,   Mumbai  seeking   information   related   to   the   setting   up   and  reconstitution   of   Consumer   Affair   Committee   of   the   Office  through multiple points.

2. Vide   CPIO   Order   dated   08   May   2012   &   28   May   2012,   CPIO  provided requisite information. 

3. Not satisfied by the PIO's reply, the Appellant preferred  First   Appeal   to   the   First   Appellate   Authority   dated   04   July  2012.

4. Vide   FAA   Order   dated   21   August   2012,   the   FAA   furnished  the information sought by the appellant.

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002477               

5. Being  aggrieved and not satisfied  by the above response  of the Public Authority, the Appellant preferred Second Appeal  before the Commission.

6. Matter was heard today  via videoconferencing. Respondent  as above were present at Mumbai. Appellant was represented as  above   at   Gorakhpur.   In   respect   of   point   2   of   the   RTI  application,   respondent   stated   that   the   erstwhile  Policyholders   Protection   Committee   was   replaced   by   Consumer  Affairs   Committee   as   per   the   IRDA   guidelines.   Appellant  pressed   for   greater   transparency   in   the   constitution   of   the  various committees referred to in the RTI application.

Decision notice

7. After hearing both parties Commission directs as follows:

Point 2: CPIO will provide a copy of the IRDA guidelines  for   constituting   the   Consumer   Affairs   Committee   along  with   the   list   of   members   of   the   newly   constituted  committee to the appellant. Point   8:   CPIO   will   provide   to   the   appellant   with   the  minutes   of   the   Board   Meetings   vide   which     the   four  committees   referred   to   in   the   RTI   application   were  constituted.

8. Information as above to be provided within two weeks of  receipt of the order. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­  
1. Shri J.P. Gupta  S/o Sh. Chhote Lal  Village - Jamdih Pandey Post Office - Labnapaar Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002477                Janpad - Basti­272002 (UP)
 2. The CPIO Executive Director (RTI/New Projects) LIC of India, RTI Deptt., Central Office  5th Floor, Yogakshema, PB No. 19953 J.B. Marg, Mumbai­400021 (Maharashtra)
3. The Appellate Authority Sr. Divisional Manager  LIC of India, RTI Deptt., Central Office  5th Floor, Yogakshema, PB No. 19953 J.B. Marg, Mumbai­400021 (Maharashtra)   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002477