Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs M/S Shri Natural Estate 92, Shahid ... on 6 February, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                                       NAFR

               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                              MCC No. 35 of 2018

                     (Arising out of W.P.C. No. 3131/2008)

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Urban
        Development, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur,
        Chhattisgarh

     2. The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development,
        Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     3. The Collector Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     4. The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Competent Authority Raipur,
        Chhattisgarh

                                                               ---- Petitioners

                                   Versus

     1. M/s Shri Natural Estate 92, Shahid Smarak Complex Rajbandha
        Maidan, Raipur, Through Its Partner D.P.Gandhi, M/s Shri Natural
        Estates, 92 Shahid Smarak Complex, Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur,
        Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

     2. The Municipal Corporation Raipur, Through Its Commissioner,
        Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur,
        Chhattisgarh

                                                             ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Mr. R. N. Pusty, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 06/02/18

1. This MCC has been filed by the petitioner for modification of the order dated 25.07.2017 passed in W.P. (C) No. 3131/2008 for substituting the name of respondent No. 4 with respondent No. 5.

2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any good ground for modification in the order.

3. Accordingly, the MCC stands disposed of. No cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka