Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Smt. Shakuntla Devi vs Baba Balak Nath Temple Trust And Another on 23 March, 2017

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Sandeep Sharma

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

                                         CWP No. 440 of 2017
                          Date of decision: 23.03.2017




                                                                      .
     ______________________________________________





     Smt. Shakuntla Devi                     .....Petitioner
                     Versus
     Baba Balak Nath Temple Trust and another





                                             ....Respondents
     ________________________________________________
     Coram:




                                            of
     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice
     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
     Whether approved for reporting?1
     _________________________________________
     For the petitioner :
                  rt                     M/s Bhuvnesh Sharma                          and
                                         Ramkant Sharma, Advocates.

     For the respondents:                 Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate.

     Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Learned Counsel for the petitioner stated at the Bar that respondent No. 1 has made recommendation to respondent No. 2 for doing the needful in terms of Annexure P-4 and prayed that respondent No. 2 may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Annexure P-4 and pass appropriate order, after hearing the petitioner.

His statement is taken on record.

2. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of this writ petition by directing respondent No. 2 to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Anenxure 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 22:03:25 :::HCHP -2-

P-4 and pass appropriate orders, after hearing the petitioner, within four weeks from today.

.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of alngwith pending application, if any.

Copy dasti.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) of Chief Justice.



     March 23, 2017
             rt                         (Sandeep Sharma)
      (hemlata)                               Judge.









                                    ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 22:03:25 :::HCHP