Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sri Aditya Prasad Barman vs Union Of India And Others on 14 May, 2013

Author: Nishita Mhatre

Bench: Nishita Mhatre

                                                               1


13 14.05.13
rpan Ct. No.17         W.P.C.T. No. 141 of 2013
                 In the matter of: Sri Aditya Prasad Barman
                                                       - Petitioner
                                            Vs.

                                           Union of India and Others
                                                               -Respondents

Sk. Siddique Rahaman ... for the Petitioner Mr. Dilip Kumar Maity ... for the Respondents The Petitioner claims that he is the legal heir of one Shib Sankar Prasad Barman. He has obtained a Succession Certificate and claims the retiral benefits of his father.

The learned advocate for the Respondents states the retiral benefits have already been paid to the deceased employee when he retired in 1973.

The learned advocate for the Respondents is directed to produce the record indicating that all payments on retirement of Shib Sankar Prasad Barman have been made after he retired.

List the matter in the monthly list of July, 2013 under the caption "Pension and Retiral Benefits".

(Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Anindita Roy Saraswati, J.)