Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Thimmakka vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 July, 2025

                                               -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:24128
                                                        WP No. 14370 of 2024


                   HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                          BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
                   WRIT PETITION NO. 14370 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)


                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SMT. THIMMAKKA
                        W/O LATE RAMAPPA,
                        AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

                   2.   SRI. SUBRAMANI
                        S/O LATE NAGAPPA,
                        AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

                        BOTH ARE R/AT:
                        KONAPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYATH,
                        CHINTAMANI TALUK,
                        KOLAR DISTRICT-563125.
                                                               ...PETITIONERS
                   (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR V.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by SHARMA          AND:
ANAND CHAYA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF           1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
KARNATAKA               PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                        DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
                        VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                        BENGALURU-560001.

                   2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                        CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT,
                        SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD,
                        CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101.

                   3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                        CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC:24128
                                      WP No. 14370 of 2024


HC-KAR



     MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
     SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD,
     CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101.

4.   THE TAHASILDAR
     OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR,
     CHINTAMANI-563125,
     CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAVY SHEKHAR., ADVOCATE)


      THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS      TO      CONSIDER   REPRESENTATION    DTD.
30.12.2023 OF THE PETITIONERS (AT ANNX-S) AND TO TRACE
OUT THE MISSING FILE RELATING TO GRANT OF HAJAM INAM
LANDS IN SY.NO.73, MEASURING 35 GUNTAS, SY.NO.136
MEASURING 31 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.148 MEASURING 1 ACRE
16 GUNTAS OF KONAPPALLI VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI,
CHINTAMANI TALUKU, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO BUILD FILE
AFRESH BY ADOPTING OTHER LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE MOEDS
INCLUDING COLLECTING COPIES OF RELEVANT PAPERS /
DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE WITH THE PETITIONERS AND TO
PASS NECESSARY ORDERS REGARDING GRANT OF SAID
LANDS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS.

      THIS   PETITION,    COMING    ON   FOR   PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM:   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
                                    -3-
                                                   NC: 2025:KHC:24128
                                              WP No. 14370 of 2024


 HC-KAR




                            ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is with regard to considering the representation dated 30.12.2023, wherein the direction has been sought against the respondent No.3 seeking re-grant in respect of the Inamland as per Annexure-S.

3. Without considering the case of the petitioner on merits, since the grievance is with regard to consideration of the representation at Annexure-S, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the same in accordance with law with an outer limit of 4 months from the receipt of this order.

4. Writ Petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

SD/-

(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60