Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Chattisgarh High Court

M/S Gopiram Enterprises vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 30 ... on 29 January, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                                              NAFR

                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                            Writ Petition (C) No.2406 of 2010

            M/s Gopiram Enterprises, Forest Contractor, Pendra Road, Distt.
            Bilaspur (C.G.) 495117 Through Sole Proprietor Deepak Agrawal,
            aged about 34 years, S/o Shri Uma Shankar Agrawal, R/o Mangli
            Bazar, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                               ---- Petitioner

                                            Versus

         1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary,              Forest
            Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat,             D.K.S.
            Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

         2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (Trade
            and Develop) Federation Limited (Web Site: www.cgmfpfed.org), A-
            25, VIP Estate, Khamhardeeh, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

         3. Conservator of Forest cum Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State
            Minor Forest Produce (Trade and Develop) Federation Limited,
            Bilaspur Forest Circle, Bilaspur (C.G.)

         4. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co Limited, Divisional Office,
            Rama Trade Centre, Opp. Rajeev Plaza, Bus Stand, Bilaspur (C.G.)

         5. Station House Incharge, Police Station Gourella, Tahsil Pendra Road,
            Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                ---- Respondents

For Petitioner: None present. For Respondent No.1 / State:

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents No.2 and 3:
Ms, Pushpa Dwivedi, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/01/2018
1. When the matter is called for hearing, none present for the petitioner.

No representation is made.

2. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma