Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Securities Appellate Tribunal

Shiv Kumar Agarwal vs Sebi on 16 March, 2016

Author: J.P. Devadhar

Bench: J.P. Devadhar

BEFORE THE            SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                             MUMBAI

                                     Date of Decision : 16.03.2016

                                    Appeal No. 316 of 2015


Shiv Kumar Agarwal
B-21, Akash Tower,
Opp.Premchand Nagar,
Judges Bungalow Road,
Bodakdev,
Ahmedabad - 380 054.                                    ...Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India,
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400 051.                                       ...Respondent


Mr. Vinay Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. K.C. Jacob, Advocate for the
Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.


                                 WITH
                                 Appeal No. 317 of 2015

Rosydevi Agarwal
F 22, Akash,
Opp.Premchand Nagar,
Judges Bungalow Road,
Bodakdev,
Ahmedabad - 380 054.                                    ...Appellant

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India,
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400 051.                                       ...Respondent


Mr. Vinay Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. K.C. Jacob, Advocate for the
Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.
                                     2


                                  WITH
                                  Appeal No. 318 of 2015

Roselabs Ltd.
123/1 Saijpur Gopalpur,
Pirana Road, Piplaj,
Ahmedabad - 382 405.                                  ...Appellant
Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India,
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400 051.                                     ...Respondent


Mr. Vinay Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. K.C. Jacob, Advocate for the
Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.

                                  WITH
                                  Appeal No. 319 of 2015
Madhudevi Agarwal
B-21, Akash Tower,
Opp.Premchand Nagar,
Judges Bungalow Road,                                 ...Appellant
Bodakdev,
Ahmedabad - 380 054.
Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India,
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400 051.                                     ...Respondent


Mr. Vinay Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. K.C. Jacob, Advocate for the
Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.

                                  WITH
                                  Appeal No. 320 of 2015
Pawan Kumar Agarwal
F 22, Akash,
Opp.Premchand Nagar,
Judges Bungalow Road,                                 ...Appellant
Bodakdev,
Ahmedabad - 380 054.
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India,
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400 051.                                     ...Respondent
                                         3




Mr. Vinay Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. K.C. Jacob, Advocate for the
Appellant.

Mr. Tomu Francis, Advocate for the Respondent.


CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer
        Jog Singh, Member

Per : J.P. Devadhar (Oral)


1.

In view of the grievance made in these appeals that the inordinate delay in passing the impugned order from the date of personal hearing has caused serious prejudice to the appellants, because, several arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants have not been considered in the impugned order and also in view of the judgment of Apex Court in the case of SEBI vs. Roofit Industries Ltd., reported in (2016) 194 Comp. Cas.186 (S.C.), counsel for the parties state that the order impugned in all these appeals be quashed and set aside and the matters be restored to the file of the Adjudicating Officer of SEBI for passing fresh order on merits and in accordance with law by leaving all contentions open.

2. Accordingly, order impugned in all these appeals are quashed and set aside and matters are restored to the file of Adjudicating Officer of SEBI for passing fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. All contentions of both parties are kept open.

3. All the Appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

Justice J.P. Devadhar Presiding Officer Sd/-

Jog Singh Member 16.03.2016 Prepared and compared by:

msb