Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sanjay Vitthal Pachaghare vs State Of Mah.Thr.Pso.Tiosa on 10 March, 2015

Bench: A.B. Chaudhari, P.N. Deshmukh

                                          1




                                                                       
                                               
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
                     Criminal Appeal No. 47 of 2002




                                              
     Sanjay Vitthal Pachaghare,
     aged about 27 years,
     occupation - Service [Teacher],




                                      
     resident of Mozari,
     Tq. Tiosa,      
     Distt. Amravati.                              .....          Appellant.
                    
                                   Versus


     The State of Maharashtra,
     through Police Station Officer,
      

     Police Station, Tiosa,
     Distt. Amravati                              .....        Respondent.
   



                                     *****
     Mr. P.R. Agrawal, Adv., for the Appellant.





     Mrs. M.H. Deshmukh, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent-
     State.

                                       *****





                                CORAM :        A.B. CHAUDHARI AND
                                               P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

                          Reserved on :        22nd January, 2015.

                       Pronounced on :         05th February, 2015
                                               & 10th March, 2015.




                                               ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:02 :::
                                           2




                                                                         
                                                 
     J U D G M E N T [Per A.B. Chaudhari,J.]:




                                                
     01.         Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 7 th

     January, 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

     Amravati,    by   which   the   appellant-accused    no.1-Sanjay        Vitthal




                                      
     Pachaghare was convicted for the offence punishable under Section
                       
     302 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer Rigorous

     Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of
                      
     payment of fine, to suffer further Rigorous Imprisonment for one

     month, the present appeal was filed by the appellant-accused in this

     Court.
      


     FACTS:
   



     02.         Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that the





     appellant-accused Sanjay married with Vandana, daughter of Kaniram

     Sonar, on 24th June,1991. Vandana was serving as a Teacher at village

     Benoda while the appellant was serving      as   a Teacher at Chandur





     Railway. Due to her employment, Vandana was residing at Benoda

     village in a rented house and the appellant-Sanjay used to visit Benoda

     once in a week. After the marriage, Vandana visited her parents on two

     occasions, at the time of Nagpanchami and Diwali and she had

     complained to them that Sanjay was suspecting          her character and




                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:02 :::
                                          3




                                                                         
     used to raise quarrel with her and was assaulting her on that count.




                                                 
     On 12th January, 1992 at about 8.15 p.m., father of Vandana received a

     message that his daughter died due to burn injuries at Mozri at the

     house of appellant.   He visited the house of the accused-appellant and




                                                
     then lodged report with the Police Station complaining that Vandana

     was ill-treated at the hands of the appellant and the appellant was

     suspecting her character. Since the incident took place at Mozri, Shri




                                     
     Rangrao Akhare gave information to the Police Station, Tiosa, about
                       
     the   incident.   Vandana's   grand-mother-in-law      [grand-mother          of

     accused] was residing with her at Benoda. The police then registered
                      
     offence punishable under Sections    498-A, 306, 302 read with Section

     34 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellant and the other
      

     accused persons. Thereafter, police filed the charge-sheet in the

     Sessions Court. The trial was held. The Sessions Court had framed the
   



     Charge against the appellant and other accused persons, who were

     ultimately acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 302,





     304-B and 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, but the

     appellant was convicted. The trial Court did not frame the Charge for

     the offence punishable under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code. The





     trial Court acquitted all the accused persons i.e. the parents of the

     appellant-Sanjay but convicted the appellant-Sanjay only for the

     offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,

     however, he was acquitted for the charges under Sections 304-B and

     498-A of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, this appeal.




                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:02 :::
                                           4




                                                                          
                                                 
     ARGUMENTS :

     03.        In support of the appeal, the learned counsel for the

     appellant, vehemently argued that the learned Sessions Judge held the




                                                
     appellant guilty of offence of murder when there is no direct evidence

     in the case. On the contrary, according to the learned counsel for the

     appellant, PW 3-Rangrao Akhare, who had lodged a report (Ex.43) to




                                     
     the police Station was the first person to visit the spot of incident and
                      
     not only that he is an independent witness, who also stated that he

     was the Special Judicial Magistrate and he was residing near the house
                     
     of accused. He stated that the door of the house was closed from inside

     and it was latched from inside. It was Dhanraj, who climbed on the roof
      

     of the house and then he removed tiles of the roof and poured water in

     the house and thereafter opened the door from inside. He further
   



     stated that at that time the appellant-Sanjay and his father Vitthal,

     both were in the field and the distance between their house and the





     field is about 2 kms. The counsel for the appellant, therefore, submitted

     that there was remote possibility of presence of appellant in the house

     at the time of the incident of burning and there is no reason





     whatsoever for believing that the appellant committed murder by

     burning the deceased Vandana. The prosecution evidence itself is very

     clear that the appellant was in the field and his father was also in the

     field at the time of the incident. The trial Court ought to have extended

     the benefit of doubt to the appellant rather than convicting him for the




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           5




                                                                           
     serious offence of murder on mere surmises and conjectures.




                                                   
     04.        The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the




                                                  
     appellant cannot be held guilty for any of the offences either of murder

     or abetment to commit suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal

     Code because the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case on all




                                     
     counts.   According to him, even the evidence regarding the ill-
                      
     treatment is untrustworthy and by way of omissions amounting to

     contradictions thereby falsifying the prosecution case. He, therefore,
                     
     submits that the appellant-accused is required to be given benefit of

     doubt and is required to be acquitted for the charge of murder under
      

     Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
   



     05.        Opposing   the   conversion   of    charge      for   the     offence

     punishable Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, he submitted that,





     firstly no charge was framed against the appellant for the offence

     punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Secondly, the

     evidence tendered by the prosecution is not trustworthy and/or





     clinching and, therefore, the appellant cannot be convicted even for

     abetment of suicide. It is not the case of the prosecution that Vandana

     had committed suicide. On the contrary, from the inception, the case

     of the prosecution was that the appellant had committed her murder.

     Finally, he prayed for order of acquittal by allowing the appeal filed by




                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           6




                                                                          
     the appellant.




                                                 
     06.        Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

     respondent-State opposed the appeal and submitted that there is




                                                
     enough evidence on record to show that the appellant was guilty of the

     offence of murder. According to the learned A.P.P., it was for the

     appellant to explain under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872




                                     
     since he was custodian of his wife and therefore, he must explain how
                      
     Vandana was burnt.       In the absence of any explanation by the

     appellant and he being the occupant of the house, the trial Court was
                     
     right in convicting the appellant for the offence of murder. In the

     alternative, the learned A.P.P. submitted that the appellant can be held
      

     guilty for the lesser offence i.e. abetment of suicide.               There is

     voluminous evidence on record to show that because of his repeated
   



     harassment, assault and instigation, Vandana committed suicide. She,

     therefore, submits that the appellant is guilty of the offence punishable





     under Section 302 or 306 of the Indian Penal Code and he be convicted

     accordingly.





     CONSIDERATION :



     07.        We have perused the entire record, evidence of the

     prosecution witnesses, oral as well as documentary. We have heard the

     learned counsel for the rival parties at length. We have perused the




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                          7




                                                                            
     impugned judgment and order of conviction under Section 302 of the




                                                    
     Indian Penal Code and the reasons recorded by the trial Court.



     08.       At the outset, this is a case where there is no direct




                                                   
     evidence that the appellant had by any overt-act committed murder

     punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The only

     evidence relied upon by the prosecution is that Vandana was burnt in




                                     
     the house owned and occupied by the appellant and his father. The
                      
     Trial Court heavily relied upon Section 106 of Evidence Act for holding

     the appellant guilty of the offence of murder. The trial Court acquitted
                     
     all other accused from all the charges framed against them. The trial

     Court convicted the appellant for the offence of murder by recording
      

     the following reasons in paragraph nos. 22 and 23:-
   



                 "22. With this discussion, now I shall come to the
                 other evidence and circumstances on record





                 which corroborate      the prosecution story of
                 homicidal death. First, I shall come to the spot
                 panchanama. It has come in spot panchanama
                 (Ex. 37) that it is the house of Vitthal Mahadeo
                 Pachghare i.e. the father of the accused no.1





                 from Mozari. There are two doors to the room
                 towards the    northern     side   where      deceased
                 Vandana was lying in dead condition due to burns
                 near the western door of said room. At the
                 northern side, there were some articles and
                 pillow which were found in burnt condition. At the




                                                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                8




                                                               
      distance of 4 ft. towards the west of dead body
      there was plastic can of kerosene in which 100




                                       
      ml. kerosene was found and it was without cork.
      The matchbox was kept on shrine(Deoghar) in
      safe condition. Here, it will not be out of place to




                                      
      mention that the panchanama is silent to speak
      that tiles of the roof were removed as narrated
      by PW-3 Akhare in his cross examination. This
      panchanama again falsify the statement of




                          
      Akhare. So far as the inquest panchanama is
            
      concerned it is at Ex.24 which speak that the
      dead body was lying. Both the hands of deceased
      were folded from the elbow towards her head,
           
      her both legs were in folded conditions at knee
      joint, eyes were partially open. This position of
      the dead body also rules out the circumstances of
      

      suicidal death and these are the circumstances
      which leads us to draw the inference as to
   



      homicidal death.


      23.        Again, I shall come to the postmortem





      report (Ex.29) wherein it has been mentioned in
      Clause 13 o the report that features were
      swollen, eyes were closed, mouth was open,
      tongue was protruded between teeth and red





      was oozing from both nostril. While para 20 of the
      post mortem notes states the position of thorax
      walls, ribs, cartileges, right and left lungs were
      congested upto 1/3rd section. It has also come in
      the post mortem notes that larynx, trachea and
      bronchie were congested. It is further mentioned
      that there were soot particles with congested




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           9




                                                                          
                 position. It is true that soot particles can be found
                 if a person is burn if alive and sometimes if the




                                                  
                 mouth remain open. Here, it is not the case to
                 decide as to whether the burn injuries ante-
                 mortem or post-mortem. Apart from this, ongoing




                                                 
                 through the postmortem notes it reveals that the
                 deceased died due to extensive burn injuries. At
                 that time, she was carrying 26 weeks pregnancy.
                 This circumstance also goes to show that the




                                     
                 woman who is carrying such advanced stage
                      
                 pregnancy will not commit suicide so easily. From
                 postmortem notes it has been established that
                 she died due to extensive burns. Therefore, in the
                     
                 present case, I have no hesitation to hold that the
                 deceased died of homicidal death."
      


     09.       Looking to the above reasons recorded by the trial Judge
   



     holding that the appellant was responsible for committing murder of

     Vandana, we find that the reasons are too weak to hold the appellant

     guilty of the offence of murder in the absence of any direct evidence.





     We therefore, do not agree with the trial Judge that there is any

     evidence on record to the satisfaction of the Court that the appellant

     could be held guilty of serious offence of murder under Section 302 of





     the Indian Penal Code.



     10.       PW 3 - Rangarao Akhare, the witness, who had seen the

     incident has stated in the evidence that when he went to the house the

     door was closed and it was     latched from inside and hence Dhanraj




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                          10




                                                                          
     climbed on the roof and removed the tiles of the roof and then he




                                                  
     poured water in the house. His evidence also shows that at the time of

     incident, Sanjay and his father Vitthal were in the field and the distance

     between their house and the field is 2 kms.               After the cross-




                                                 
     examination made by accused, the Public Prosecutor did not bother to

     cross-examine this witness who deposed favouring the accused. The

     probability of the appellant and his father at the time of incident being




                                      
     in the field, therefore, cannot be ruled out by reading his evidence who
                       
     was not declared hostile. The benefit of doubt must go to the accused.

     We, therefore, reverse the finding recorded by the trial Judge
                      
     convicting the appellant for the offence of murder under Section 302 of

     the Indian Penal Code.
      


     11.        The next question is about the Charge under Section 498-A
   



     of the Indian Penal Code. The trial Judge has acquitted the appellant

     for the said offence and the State has not preferred appeal against the





     said acquittal of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section

     498-A of the Indian Penal Code. We are satisfied that the conviction

     ought to have been recorded under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal





     Code. There is ample evidence to do so. But, in the absence of appeal,

     we can do nothing.



     12.        The next question is whether the appellant could be

     convicted for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                          11




                                                                            
     Penal Code. We have considered the submissions made by the learned




                                                  
     counsel for the appellant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Insofar

     as the aspect of conversion of charge to a lower offence is concerned,

     the question is no more res integra, in view of the judgment given by




                                                 
     the three-Judge Bench in the case of Dalbir Singh Vs. State of U.P.

     reported in (2004)5 SCC 334. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the said

     decision has observed in paragraph 17 thus:




                                     
                      
                    "17. There are a catena of decisions of this
                    Court on the same lines and it is not necessary
                     
                    to burden this judgment by making reference
                    to each one of them.      Therefore, in view of
                    Section 464 CrPC, it is possible for the
                    appellate or revisional court to convict an
      


                    accused for an offence for which no charge
   



                    was framed unless the court is of the opinion
                    that a failure of justice would in fact occasion.
                    In order to judge whether a failure of justice





                    has been occasioned, it will be relevant to
                    examine whether the accused was aware of
                    the basic ingredients of the offence for which
                    he is being convicted and whether the main
                    facts sought to be established against him





                    were explained to him clearly and whether he
                    got a fair chance to defend himself. We are,
                    therefore, of the opinion that Sangaraboina
                    Sreenu   was   not   correctly   decided      as    it
                    purports to lay down as a principle of law that
                    where the accused is charged under Section




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                          12




                                                                          
                    302 IPC, he cannot be convicted for the
                    offence under Section 306 IPC."




                                                 
     13.        Following the above dicta and the observations about




                                                
     verification of the accused having a fair chance to defend himself for

     the proposed converted charge, we have examined the entire record

     including the evidence as well as questions put by the trial Court to the




                                     
     accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Upon
                      
     perusal thereof, we are satisfied that there are specific questions in

     relation to the ill-treatment, harassment, instigation and abetment of
                     
     suicide put to the appellant-accused-Sanjay, which he answered. There

     is voluminous evidence to draw the inference that she committed

     suicide due to constant trepidation from appellant. The inference that,
      


     the appellant Sanjay was fully responsible for the commission of
   



     suicide by Vandana can very well be drawn since the evidence is very

     very weighty for holding him guilty accordingly. The appellant has





     answered all the questions in relation thereto in his statement under

     Section 313, Criminal Procedure Code.



     14.        We reproduce some questions and answers hereunder:-





                "Q.No.6 : It has further come in his evidence that
                          Madhukar Chichote had come to him and
                          told that his son-in-law took out all the
                          clothes and went on road to commit suicide
                          so he should come along with him and so he
                          went to Mozari along with him. At that time
                          it was 10 p.m. What have you to say about
                          it?




                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                13




                                                               
      Ans        It is false."




                                      
      "Q.No.12: It has further come in his evidence that
                Vandana told him that she being a teacher
                she has to talk with others. What have you
                to say about it?




                                     
      Ans      : It is correct."

      "Q.No.16: It has come in the evidence of PW 4 Kantabai
                Gohad that Vandana was her tenant, she
                was a teacher, her grand-mother-in-law was
                residing with her, and her husband used to




                           
                visit the house of Vandana. What have you
             ig to say about it?

      Ans      : It is correct."
           
      "Q.No.18: It has further come in her evidence that
                Vandana was her tenant and at that time
                Vandana was carrying pregnancy of about 5
                to 6 months. What have you to say about it?
      

      Ans      : It is correct."
   



      "Q.No.35: Do you want to examine yourself on oath?

      Ans      : No."





      "Q.No.36: Do you want to examine defence witnesses?

      Ans      : No."
      .

      "Q.No.39: Do you want to say anything more about this
                case?





      Ans      : Vandana was teacher at Benoda & I was
                 working as teacher at Chandur Railway. On
                 holidays I used to visit Benoda. The landlady
                 told me that Vandana used to talk with
                 males & males used to remain in house till
                 late hours. Thereupon I told my wife that it is
                 not proper to behave in such a manner.
                 Therefore, she was behaving properly. She
                 came to Mozari by taking leave, but she




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           14




                                                                        
                           started behaving as earlier, therefore I called
                           her father & told him about the situation.




                                                
                           There was altercation between her and her
                           father. He gave slap to her and her cheek &
                           asked her not to behave in a such manner.
                           She agreed to behave properly. Thereafter
                           her father told me that he would take




                                               
                           Vandana with him, I agreed for the same. He
                           also invited me. I told him that I have not
                           taken leave. I will come lateron. He called
                           us by taking leave. I do not know what
                           conversation took place between her & her
                           father subsequently."




                                      
     15.
                      
               From perusal of defence and the questions and answers in

     reply, it is clear that though the appellant claimed that he was in the
                     
     field with his father, he has not said a word as to how Vandana died of

     burning. That apart, the fact that the door of the house was closed,

     latched from inside and Vandana was burning inside the house shows
      


     that she committed suicide by neatly latching the door from inside as
   



     she was determined to commit suicide. The reason given by the trial

     Judge that as she was pregnant of five months, she was not even





     thinking of committing suicide,    does not appeal to us, as no such

     straight-jacket formula can be suggested. In the instant case,             the

     evidence of the witnesses is abundantly clear about the repeated ill-

     treatment given by the appellant and his vitriolic attitude towards





     Vandana for flimsy reasons, she used to talk to the students or other

     persons. He used to assault and torture her every now and then. Even

     when she was pregnant from him on 7.12.1991 he seriously assaulted

     her and she suffered head injuries which she had shown to the

     witnesses. The appellant was thus so cruel on his own flimsy ideas and




                                                ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           15




                                                                           
     suspicion about her within a short period of two to three months of the




                                                   
     marriage when he had knowingly married a teacher girl. He did not

     even bother about her five months' pregnancy from him. The appellant-

     Sanjay exhibited grotesque behaviour towards her in her early married




                                                  
     life, who was brought up, educated by her father and somehow got

     employment for her as a Teacher with great difficulties.                But the

     appellant, in his own whims and fancies, figment of imagination,




                                      
     started suspecting the girl, his wife, because she used to talk with the
                       
     students, other teachers. The appellant refused to understand that she

     being a Teacher was bound to talk to the boys or other teachers, as it
                      
     was a part of her profession. In fact, she told him so. The appellant

     deliberately forgot and ignored that        his own grand-mother was
      

     residing with her in order to have security for her. Not only that, the old

     landlady and her daughter were also acting like her guardian. The old
   



     landlady was treating her like daughter. However, the appellant did not

     simply understand the aspirations of a woman, i.e. his wife Vandana,





     who became a teacher with great dreams of marriage and the married

     life. The story is thus tragic that the appellant tortured her so much

     that she was compelled to commit suicide. We record the following





     portion from the evidence of various witnesses in this connection to

     support what we have stated above:

                    "PW 4 Kantabai Gohad: I know the deceased
                    Vandana, she was the teacher, she was
                    residing in my room as a tenant.            One old
                    woman was residing with her.            She was a




                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                             16




                                                                
       grand mother in law. The husband of her used
       to visit the house of Vandana.           I know the




                                       
       woman and the husband of deceased Vandana.
       The witness was asked to go to the accused
       persons and identify if any one of them is her




                                      
       husband     and   the   grand     mother      of    the
       deceased.    She went to the accused but she
       could not recognize any of them. The husband
       of the deceased Vandana used to beat her on




                        
       suspicion. I had given advise to the husband of
         
       deceased that if he did not want his wife in his
       house he should give divorce to her, else he
       should keep her properly instead of giving ill-
        
       treatment to her. I do not remember if some
       Kale had giving understanding to the husband
       of Vandana. When she was residing in my room
      

       as tenant she was pregnant of about 5
       months."
   



       "PW 5 Mahadeo Bhele : I know deceased
       Vandana, she was a teacher in the same school





       where I was also serving as teacher. After the
       marriage there had been a restriction on her to
       go to the house of any other person and she
       was telling this fact to us.     Before about 7-8





       days of the incident she had met me, in the
       school.     At that time she had shown the
       welling/sign of beatings on her neck and she
       told me that - that was beating given by
       accused Sanjay, and then she went to the
       house."




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                             17




                                                             
       "PW 6 Manikrao Kale : I know deceased
       Vandana. She was sister in law i.e. the (cousin)




                                    
       sister of my wife. I also know her husband and
       parents in law.   They are before the Court. I
       only know Sanjay Pachghare the accused and




                                   
       his father Vitthalrao Pachghare.        Deceased
       Vandana was a teacher in the school. At the
       relevant time I was Extension Officer in a
       Panchayat Samiti Warud. Before the incident




                        
       i.e. on 7.12.1991 I had met her, because I had
         
       gone to her school. At that time when I was
       sitting in the office of head master of the
       school she had complained me and told that
        
       her husband used to beat her on suspicion on
       her character. On the same day her husband
       Sanjay was also in the same village so I met
      

       him and gave a understanding to him, that he
       should not behave like that. On 7.12.1991 she
   



       had shown oal (line of swelling on her neck)
       and told that it was due to the beat of accused
       to her."





       "PW 7 Sau. Kamal Pande : Deceased
       Vandana Pachghare was residing in the house





       of my mother as tenant. I was residing with
       my mother. The grand mother Indla               was
       residing with deceased Vandana and that her
       husband used to visit some times at her house.
       There used to be always quarrel between the
       deceased Vandana and her husband.                Her
       husband also used to beat her in the night and




                                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                         18




                                                                         
                    that we heard the noice of her weeping. Her
                    husband used to raise the voice of radio and




                                                
                    used to beat her. However, I do not know as to
                    why quarrel used to arise between them.
                    Before her death she was pregnant of about




                                               
                    five months.   Her husband used to raise the
                    doubt about her chastity whenever she used to
                    go out. The grand mother of her who was
                    residing with her had told me that deceased




                                    
                    Vandana was good in nature but her husband
                      
                    unnecessary giving trouble to her".
                     
     16.       The above evidence that he used to raise the voice of radio

     to suppress her cry while assaulting her is the tale-telling story of

     Vandana. She was then also assaulted on 7th December, 1991 by the
      


     appellant-Sanjay and caused injuries to her which she had shown to
   



     the witnesses and thereafter on 12.1.1992 the incident took place and

     she committed suicide at Mozri at the house of the appellant.





     17.       We have no doubt that the appellant-Sanjay had tormented

     Vandana knowing that she was five months' pregnant from him.

     Unable to bear the barbaric torture though pregnant, she took a





     decision to commit suicide. In our opinion, the above evidence is

     strong enough to convict the appellant for the offence punishable

     under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. As earlier said, we have

     perused the entire evidence on record as to whether the appellant was

     given a fair trial under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. We are




                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           19




                                                                           
     satisfied that the appellant received a fair trial and all the relevant




                                                   
     questions appearing in the evidence of        witnesses which we have

     discussed were asked to him and he answered the same.




                                                  
     18.        That is how is the 'tragic' story of 'VANDANA', a village

     daughter of India who had four sisters in addition. What difficulties a

     father of five girls living in a village must have faced for educating




                                      
     Vandana and then getting her employment. Still she got educated and
                       
     became qualified to become a Zilla Parishad Primary Teacher to serve

     in a village. She was earning Rs. 2500/- per month. She was a girl of
                      
     only twenty-four years with an ambition to have a husband like her, a

     teacher, and married the appellant, knowing nothing about his
      

     suspicious nature, vitriolic attitude. She had a dream and aspirations

     of a happy married life. She became pregnant from appellant. But she
   



     had no other option than to commit suicide with her still-born                just

     within six months of her marriage due to the torture by the surly





     accused. Her heart must have shed a secret tear and grief welled up

     inside to constrict the throat before committing suicide with still-born.

                We find that the cases of suspicion about character of a





     newly married wife at a very early stage, as within six months in this

     case, are on the rise which result into commission of such grave

     offences. We think the society must attend to this typical menace and

     make efforts to curb unnecessary and unwarranted and surly behaviour

     of the husband.




                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           20




                                                                            
               It is most unfortunate that the appellant failed to perform his




                                                    
     duties and obligations to protect and take care of his wife as per the

     marriage vows.    Laws are not enough to combat this evil.               A wider

     social movement of educating women of their rights is needed,




                                                   
     particularly in rural areas. We would quote below paras 55, 56 and 57

     from the Judgment of Supreme Court in the case of State (Delhi

     Administration) Vs. Laxman Kumar & others [(1985) 4 SCC 476],




                                      
     which are apt:-   
                "55.        Marriage, according to the community to
                      
                which parties belong, is sacramental and is believed to
                have been ordained in heaven. The religious rites
                performed at the marriage altar clearly indicate that the
                man accepts the woman as his better-half by assuring her
                protection as guardian, ensuring food and necessaries of
      

                life as the provider, guaranteeing companionship as the
                mate and by resolving that the pleasures and sorrows in
                the pursuit of life shall be shared with her and Dharma
   



                shall be observed. ...."
                "56.          Every   marriage      ordinarily    involves   a
                transplant. A girl born and brought up in her natural family
                when given in marriage, has to leave the natural setting





                and come into a new family. When a tender plant is
                shifted from the place of origin to a new setting, great
                care is taken to ensure that the new soil is suitable and
                not far different from the soil where the plant had hitherto
                been growing; care is taken to ensure that there is not
                much of variation of the temperature, watering facility is
                assured and congeniality is attempted to be provided.





                When a girl is transplanted from her natural setting into an
                alien family, the care expected is bound to be more than
                in the case of a plant. Plant has life but the girl has a more
                than developed one. Human emotions are unknown to the
                plant life. In the growing years in the natural setting the
                girl - now a bride - has formed her own habits, gathered
                her own impressions, developed her own aptitudes and
                got used to a way of life. In the new setting some of these
                have to be accepted and some she has to surrender. This
                process of adaptation is not and cannot be one-sided. Give
                and take, live and let live, are the ways of life and when




                                                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                      21




                                                                      
           the bride is received in the new family she must have a
           feeling of welcome and by the fond bonds of love and




                                              
           affection, grace and generosity, attachment and
           consideration that she may receive in the family of the
           husband, she will get into a new mould; the mould which
           would last for her life. She has to get used to a new set of
           relationships - one type with the husband, another with
           the parents-in-law, a different one with the other superiors




                                             
           and yet a different one with the younger ones in the
           family. For this she would require loving guidance. The
           elders in the family, including the mother-in- law, are
           expected to show her the way. The husband has to stand
           as a mountain of support ready to protect her and espouse




                                 
           her cause where she is on the right and equally ready to
           cover her either by pulling her up to protecting her
           willingly taking the responsibility on to himself when she is
                 
           at fault. The process has to be a natural one and there has
           to be exhibition of cooperation and willingness from every
           side. Otherwise how would the transplant succeed!"
                
           "57.          There is yet another aspect which we think is
           very germane, Of late there is a keen competition
           between man and woman all the world over. There has
           been a feeling that the world has been a man-dominated
      

           one and women as a class have been trying to raise their
           heads by claiming equality. We are of the view that
           women must rise and on account of certain virtues which
   



           Nature has endowed them with to the exclusion of man,
           due credit must be given to women as possessors of those
           exclusive qualities. It is the woman who is capable of
           playing the more effective role in the preservation of
           society and, therefore, she has to be respected. She has





           the greater dose of divinity in her and by her gifted
           qualities she can protect the society against evil. To that
           extent women have special qualities to serve society in
           due discharge of the social responsibility. While all these
           are true and the struggle for upliftment has to continue,
           can it be forgotten that men and women in the human





           creation are complementary to each other and it is only
           when a man and a woman are put together that a unit is
           formed? One without the other has no place in the
           community of homo sapiens. Therefore, in a world where
           man and woman are indispensable to each other and the
           status of one depends upon the existence and longing of
           the other, to what extent is competition between the two
           justifiable is a matter to be debated in a cool and healthy
           setting."

     19.   The appellant-accused was heard on the point of sentence




                                              ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                           22




                                                                           
     on the previous date. His counsel submitted that the appellant, who




                                                   
     was working as a Teacher, lost his employment because of the

     conviction for murder and he further submitted that the father of the

     appellant is a very old man and it is the appellant who has to take his




                                                  
     care.   He then submitted that the incident is of the year 1992 and

     looking to the time gap, lenient view in the matter of awarding

     sentence should be taken by this Court.




                                      
     20.
                       
                We have carefully considered the submissions made by

     learned counsel for the appellant. In the first place, it is a well settled
                      
     legal position that mere delay in the trial or decision of appeal is no

     consideration in the matter of award of sentence all the more because
      

     the appellant was convicted for the offence of murder and sentenced

     to life imprisonment; but he obtained bail from this Court when he filed
   



     appeal in 2002 and, thus, was throughout on bail. We, therefore, do

     not agree with the learned counsel for the appellant that the number of





     years that have passed can be a consideration. We then find that the

     father of the appellant ought to have taken care by putting the

     appellant Sanjay on the right track and should have prevented him





     from torturing Vandana within a short span from the date of marriage

     on frivolous reasons. He failed in his duty to do so and, therefore, we

     are not impressed with the said submission. The loss of employment of

     the appellant is his own creation for which none can be held

     responsible.




                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::
                                          23




                                                                          
                We now find that Vandana died within six months of




                                                 
     marriage carrying pregnancy of five months from the appellant along

     with still-born child by committing suicide due to grotesque behaviour

     of the appellant.    The surly appellant and his suspicion about her




                                                
     character was wholly baseless and, in fact, his grand-mother was

     residing with Vandana, which was somewhat the guarantee about the

     watch on Vandana or her freedom. While he was assaulting her, he




                                     
     used to raise the volume of radio to suppress her cry. To say the least,
                        
     it was barbaric.    Under such circumstances, we think the appellant

     must be handed down the maximum punishment. Section 306 of Indian
                       
     Penal Code provides for a sentence upto ten years. We have decided

     to sentence him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years and
      

     without any facility of remission, as it is expedient to have deterrence.

     That being so, we make the following order:-
   



                                   ORDER

[i] Criminal Appeal No. 47 of 2002 is partly allowed.

[ii] The Judgment and Order dated 7th January, 2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, in Sessions Trial No. 186 of 1997, convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code is set aside and is modified and the appellant is, instead, held guilty of offence ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 ::: 24 punishable under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code.

[iii] The appellant is sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years with no facility of remission, and shall also pay fine of Rs.10,000-00 [rupees ten thousand only] payable to the father of Vandana, in default, to undergo further sentence for six months.

[iv] The appellant-accused shall be entitled to set off for the period of imprisonment already undergone by him as per Section 428 of Criminal Procedure Code.

               Judge                                                  Judge





                                   -0-0-0-0-





     |हेडाऊ|




                                                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/03/2015 23:59:03 :::