Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Lakshmamma vs Sri Teekappa S/O Subba Naika on 22 November, 2012

Author: Ravi Malimath

Bench: Ravi Malimath

                        1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

        ON THE 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012

                    BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

             MFA NO 4044 OF 2012(MV)

BETWEEN

SMT LAKSHMAMMA
W/O KALASEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/A MAGALUR VILLAGE,
SANGAMESHWARAPET POST,
KHANDYA HOBLI, CHICKMAGALUR TQ.
& DIST
                                   ... APPELLANT

(BY M/S. DHARMASHREE ASSOCIATES & ARUN &
SACHIN, ADVS.-ABSENT)

AND

  1. SRI TEEKAPPA S/O SUBBA NAIKA
     AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
     DRIVER OF BUS BEARING NO.KA 18A 402
     R/A BALAGADI ROAD, KOPPA TOWN & TQ.
     CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT

  2. THE PRESIDENT
     TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
     LIMITED
     KOPPA, CHICKMAGALUR DIST
     RC OWNER OF THE BUS
                             2




  3. THE BRANCH MANAGER
     THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
     K.M.ROAD, CHICKMAGALUR
                               ... RESPONDENTS

      This appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of M.V.
Act against the judgment and award dated 29.3.2011
passed in MVC.No.358/09 on the file of the Addl.
District Judge and MACT, Chikmagalur, to the extent of
disallowed claim and this appeal be allowed by
enhancing the compensation to the extent claimed by
the appellant to Rs.5,25,000/-.

      This appeal coming on for orders this day, the
court delivered the following:-

                      JUDGMENT

None appears for the appellant nor is there any representation made. Inspite of granting sufficient time, still office objections have not been complied with.

2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE *alb/-