Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Rumi Sein And Others vs Sanjay Sureka And Others on 26 February, 2021

Author: Moushumi Bhattacharya

Bench: Moushumi Bhattacharya

OD-7, 12 & 13

                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                  Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                           ORIGINAL SIDE

                        IA NO: GA/6/2021
                                IN
                           CS/41/2011
                     RUMI SEIN AND OTHERS
                             VERSUS
                   SANJAY SUREKA AND OTHERS

                                  AND

                        IA NO: GA/5/2020
                                IN
                           CS/41/2011
                     RUMI SEIN AND OTHERS
                             VERSUS
                   SANJAY SUREKA AND OTHERS

                                  AND

                          IA NO: GA/4/2020
                                  IN
                             CS/143/2013
                       SANJAY SUREKA & ORS.
                               VERSUS
                         RATAN LAL NAHATA


BEFORE :
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Date : 26th February, 2021

                                                                   Appearance:
                                                        Mr. Rupak Ghosh, Adv.
                                                    Mr. Rajesh Upadhyay, Adv.
                                                     Mr. Surabita Biswas, Adv.
                                                            Mr. Ratul Das, Adv.
                                    ... for respondent no. 1 & 2 in CS 41 of 2011

and petitioner in CS 143 of 2013 Mr. Ayan Dutta, Adv.

Mr. Ranajit Roy, Adv.

Mr. Tapan Sil, Adv.

... for the petitioner in CS 41 of 2011 and respondent no.3 in CS 143 of 2013 2 Mr. Farhan Ghaffar, Adv.

Mr. Tanvir Alam, Adv.

... for the plaintiff no.3 in CS 41 of 2011 The Court : This application under Section 340 of The Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the defendant no.3 in respect of certificate of marriage annexed to an application for substitution taken out by the plaintiff no.3. Since the charges relate to forgery and fabrication, let affidavits be filed to the application before the matter is taken up for hearing.

It is also prayed for on behalf of the defendant no.3 that a supplementary affidavit may be filed to bring on record certain other documents. Such leave is granted.

List this matter after three weeks, as prayed for. Replies in the meantime.

It is has been submitted by counsel appearing for the parties that the applications, IA No.GA/5/2020 in CS/41/2011 and IA No.GA/4/2020 in CS/143/2013 are connected to this matter, let all these applications appear on the returnable date. The defendant nos.1, 2, 3 and the plaintiffs are given leave to file their respective affidavits in the connected matters in Court today.

(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.) bp.