Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Naresh Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 14 July, 2022

Author: Vivek Kumar Birla

Bench: Vivek Kumar Birla





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 42
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION DEFECTIVE U/S 372 CR.P.C (LEAVE TO APPEAL) No. - 79 of 2019
 

 
Applicant :- Naresh Pratap Singh
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanendra Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mukesh Kumar
 

 
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
 

Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.

Re: Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2019 No one is present on behalf of the appellant to press the delay condonation application even in the revised call of additional cause list. Mohd. Atif holding brief of Sri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent is present. From perusal of order-sheet we find that on the earlier several occasions the case was reported to be adjourned. As per Stamp Reporter's report there is delay of 694 days in filing appeal.

Accordingly, present delay condonation application is rejected for want of prosecution. Re: Application for Leave to Appeal As already held by this Court in number of cases that leave application filed under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. is not required in the appeal filed by the victim under Section 372 Cr.P.C. like the present appeal. A reference may be made to the order dated 4.8.2021 passed in Criminal Appeal U/S 372 Cr.P.C. No. 123 of 2021 (Rita Devi vs. State of U.P. and another). As such, the application for leave to appeal stands rejected as not maintainable and/or not required. Re: Appeal Since the delay condonation application has been rejected today, consequently, present appeal also stands dismissed. Order Date :- 14.7.2022 Lalit Shukla