Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Gujarat High Court

Ishwarbhai Chhotabhai Rathod vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 25 June, 2015

Author: J.B.Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

            C/SCA/17735/2013                                               ORDER




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17735 of 2013


                                           With
               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18661 of 2013
                                           With
               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17736 of 2013
                                             TO
               SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17744 of 2013
==========================================================
              ISHWARBHAI CHHOTABHAI RATHOD....Petitioner(s)
                                Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT & 4....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ZUBIN F BHARDA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
Mr SWAPNESHWAR GOUTAM, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR DG CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 4
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 5
==========================================================

           CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
 
                                 Date : 25/06/2015 
                               COMMON ORAL ORDER

This bunch of petitions was order to be notified for final disposal  on 18.06.2015 on top of the board. Today, when the matter is taken up  for hearing Mr. Goutam, the learned AGP submitted that the State would  like to file reply to the petition. 

The State should answer two questions i.e. (i) Although the State  decided   to   revise   the   pay   of   the   petitioners   in   terms   of   the   6 th  Pay  Commission recommendation, yet the same was given effect to from the  year 2009 and not 2006. The State should explain why the benefits came  Page 1 of 2 C/SCA/17735/2013 ORDER to be granted from the year 2009. (ii) Although the basic pay has been  revised   in   terms   of   the   6th  Pay   Commission   recommendation   from  01.01.2009 yet the dearness allowance which is paid on the basic pay, is  at   the   rate   of   24%.   The   Government   Resolution   dated   13.10.2009  provides for dearness allowance at the rate of 64%. The reply shall be  filed and placed on record. 

The  State  should  also  provide  the  information  as  regards  those  employees to whom the benefit has been extended from the year 2006  with dearness allowance at the rate of 64% of the basic pay.

Let the matters appear on 06.07.2015 on top of the board.

A   copy   of   the   reply   shall   be   served   to   the   learned   advocate  appearing for the petitioners well in advance. 

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)  aruna Page 2 of 2