Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 11]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Subrata Bhattacharya vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India on 9 November, 2016

Bench: Anil R. Dave, A.M. Khanwilkar

                                                                        REVISED
     ITEM NO.4                     COURT NO.2               SECTION XVII

                          S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     CIVIL APPEAL        NO(S).   13301/2015

     SUBRATA BHATTACHARYA                                     Appellant(s)

                                               VERSUS

     SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA                     Respondent(s)

     (With appln(s) for appropriate direction and directions and
     exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption
     from filing O.T. of annexures and impleadment(s) and
     intervention(s) and permission to file additional documents and
     stay and office report)

     WITH
     C.A. No. 13319/2015
     (With appln.(s) for directions and ex-parte stay and exemption from
     filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file
     additional documents and Office Report)

      C.A. No. 13394/2015
     (With appln.(s) for intervention and permission to bring
     additional facts and documents on record and impleadment(s) and
     intervention(s) and permission to file additional documents and
     stay and Office Report)

      C.A. No. 13410/2015
     (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing c/c of
     the impugned judgment and Office Report)

      W.P.(C) No. 500/2015
     (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report)

         T.C.(C) No. 134/2015

         T.C.(C) No. 31/2016

         T.C.(C) No. 30/2016

         T.C.(Crl.) No. 2/2016

         T.C.(Crl.) No. 1/2016
Signature Not Verified


         T.C.(Crl.) No. 3/2016
Digitally signed by
NARENDRA PRASAD
Date: 2016.11.16
17:53:14 IST
Reason:

      W.P.(C) No. 640/2016
     (With Office Report)

                                                1
 W.P.(C) No. 613/2016
(With Office Report)

Date : 09/11/2016 These matters were called on for hearing today.


CORAM :
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

For Appellant(s)/
Applicant(s)         Mr.   Anil B. Diwan,Sr.Adv.
                     Mr.   Abhishek Amritanshu,Adv.
                     Mr.   Amit Pawan,AOR
                     Mr.   Akshat Srivastava,Adv.
                     Mr.   Gaurav Singh,Adv.

                     Mr.   Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.
                     Mr.   Sameer Rohatgi,Adv.
                     Mr.   Ankur Saigal,Adv.
                     Ms.   Sadapurna Mukherjee,Adv.
                     Mr.   E. C. Agrawala,AOR

                     Mr.   Vipin Nair,AOR
                     Mr.   P.B. Suresh,Adv.
                     Mr.   C.P. Chanderasekharan,Adv.
                     Mr.   Abhay Pratap Singh,Adv.

                     Mr. Manoj Nayik,Adv.
                     Mr. Abdulrahiman Tamboli,Adv.
                     Mr. S. Gowthaman,AOR

                     Mr. Rajesh P.,AOR

                     Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra,Adv.
                     Mr. Shiv Ram Pandey,Adv.
                     Mr. Shailendra Kumar Mishra,Adv.

For Respondent(s)/
Applicant(s)         Mr.   R. Balasubramanian,Adv.
                     Ms.   Aarti Sharma,Adv.
                     Mr.   Ananya Mishra,Adv.
                     Mr.   Santosh Kumar,Adv.
                     Mr.   Mukesh Kumar Maroria,AOR

                     Mr. Amit Kumar,AOR
                     Mr. Shuraya Sh. Sahay,Adv.

                     Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,AOR

                     Mrs. Anil Katiyar,AOR


                                    2
                   Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,AOR

                   Ms. Neela Gohkale,Adv.
                   Mr. Devanshu Sharma,Adv.
                   Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal,AOR

                   Mr.   Pratap Venugopal,Adv.
                   Ms.   Surekha Raman,Adv.
                   Mr.   Anuj Sarma,Adv.
                   Ms.   Niharika,Adv.
                   Mr.   Aman Shukla,Adv.
                   Ms.   Kanika Kalaiyarasan,Adv.
                   For   M/s. K.J. John & Co.

                   Mr.   Vikas Mahajan,Adv.
                   Mr.   Vinod Sharma,AOR
                   Mr.   Arun Singh,Adv.
                   Mr.   Pawan Relay,Adv.

                   Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik,Adv.

                   Mr.   Sudharshan Singh Rawat,Adv.
                   Mr.   Deepak Kunwar,Adv.
                   Mr.   Vijay K.,Adv.
                   Ms.   Firoza M.,Adv.
                   Mr.   Sudhir Kumar,Adv.

                   Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.

                   Mr. T. Sudhaker,Adv.
                   For Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.

      UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                              O R D E R

I.A. NO.14 IN C.A. No.13301/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. has submitted that the C.B.I. Officials would like to look into all the seventy six (76) First Information Reports, which have been filed, so as to ascertain, in terms of the order dated 12.03.2013 passed by this Court in C.A. No.6572 of 2004, whether they are to be transferred or to be investigated by the C.B.I. To enable the C.B.I. to do the needful, hearing is adjourned to 10.01.2017.

List this I.A. and other matters on 10.01.2017 3 I.A. NO.15 IN C.A. No.13394/2015 It has been fairly submitted by Mr. Pratap Venugopal, the learned counsel appearing for the SEBI/SEBI Committee, that the representation made by the applicant(s) is being looked into by the SEBI Committee and appropriate action shall be taken on the representation.

In view of the said statement, the I.A. stands disposed of as dismissed.

I.A. Nos.9, 10, 11 & 12 IN C.A. No.13394/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant(s) submitted that the applicant(s) would like to make an application in the nature of a representation to the SEBI Committee. If such an application is made, we are sure that the SEBI Committee shall consider the same and take an appropriate decision thereon.

In view of the above, the I.As stand disposed of as dismissed.

I.A. Nos.17 & 18 IN C.A. No.13301/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant(s) submitted that they have already made a representation to the SEBI Committee and we are sure that an appropriate action shall be taken on the said representation.

In view of the above, the I.As. Stand disposed of as dismissed.



  (NARENDRA PRASAD)                                     (SNEH BALA MEHRA)
    COURT MASTER                                       ASSISTANT REGISTRAR




                                         4
ITEM NO.4                COURT NO.2               SECTION XVII

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 13301/2015 SUBRATA BHATTACHARYA Appellant(s) VERSUS SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for appropriate direction and directions and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. of annexures and impleadment(s) and intervention(s) and permission to file additional documents and stay and office report) WITH C.A. No. 13319/2015 (With appln.(s) for directions and ex-parte stay and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and Office Report) C.A. No. 13394/2015 (With appln.(s) for intervention and permission to bring additional facts and documents on record and impleadment(s) and intervention(s) and permission to file additional documents and stay and Office Report) C.A. No. 13410/2015 (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 500/2015 (With appln.(s) for directions and Office Report) T.C.(C) No. 134/2015 T.C.(C) No. 31/2016 T.C.(C) No. 30/2016 T.C.(Crl.) No. 2/2016 T.C.(Crl.) No. 1/2016 T.C.(Crl.) No. 3/2016 W.P.(C) No. 640/2016 (With Office Report) 5 W.P.(C) No. 613/2016 (With Office Report) Date : 09/11/2016 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) Mr. Anil B. Diwan,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Amritanshu,Adv. Mr. Amit Pawan,AOR Mr. Akshat Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh,Adv.
Mr. Mahesh Agarwal,Adv.
Mr. Sameer Rohatgi,Adv.
Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv.
Ms. Sadapurna Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,AOR Mr. Vipin Nair,AOR Mr. P.B. Suresh,Adv.
Mr. C.P. Chanderasekharan,Adv. Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh,Adv.
Mr. Manoj Nayik,Adv.
Mr. Abdulrahiman Tamboli,Adv. Mr. S. Gowthaman,AOR Mr. Rajesh P.,AOR Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Shiv Ram Pandey,Adv.
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Mishra,Adv.
For Respondent(s)/ Applicant(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian,Adv.
Ms. Aarti Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Ananya Mishra,Adv.
Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,AOR Mr. Amit Kumar,AOR Mr. Shuraya Sh. Sahay,Adv.
Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh,AOR 6 Mrs. Anil Katiyar,AOR Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,AOR Ms. Neela Gohkale,Adv.
Mr. Devanshu Sharma,Adv.
Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal,AOR Mr. Pratap Venugopal,Adv.
Ms. Surekha Raman,Adv.
Mr. Anuj Sarma,Adv.
Ms. Niharika,Adv.
Mr. Aman Shukla,Adv.
Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan,Adv. For M/s. K.J. John & Co.
Mr. Vikas Mahajan,Adv.
Mr. Vinod Sharma,AOR Mr. Arun Singh,Adv.
Mr. Pawan Relay,Adv.
Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik,Adv.
Mr. Sudharshan Singh Rawat,Adv. Mr. Deepak Kunwar,Adv.
Mr. Vijay K.,Adv.
Ms. Firoza M.,Adv.
Mr. Sudhir Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Gagan Gupta,Adv.
Mr. T. Sudhaker,Adv.
For Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. NO.14 IN C.A. No.13301/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. has submitted that the C.B.I. Officials would like to look into all the seventy six (76) First Information Reports, which have been filed, so as to ascertain, in terms of the order dated 12.03.2013 passed by this Court in C.A. No.6572 of 2004, whether they are to be transferred or to be investigated by the C.B.I. To enable the C.B.I. to do the needful, hearing is adjourned to 10.01.2017.
List this I.A. and other matters on 10.01.2017 7 I.A. NO.15 IN C.A. No.13301/2015 It has been fairly submitted by Mr. Pratap Venuopal, the learned counsel appearing for the SEBI/SEBI Committee, that the representation made by the applicant(s) is being looked into by the SEBI Committee and appropriate action shall be taken on the representation.
In view of the said statement, the I.A. stands disposed of as dismissed.
I.A. Nos.9, 10, 11 & 12 IN C.A. No.13394/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant(s) submitted that the applicant(s) would like to make an application in the nature of a representation to the SEBI Committee. If such an application is made, we are sure that the SEBI Committee shall consider the same and take an appropriate decision thereon.
In view of the above, the I.As stand disposed of as dismissed.
I.A. Nos.17 & 18 IN C.A. No.13301/2015 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant(s) submitted that they have already made a representation to the SEBI Committee and we are sure that an appropriate action shall be taken on the said representation.
In view of the above, the I.As. Stand disposed of as dismissed.
(NARENDRA PRASAD) (SNEH BALA MEHRA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 8