Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Gujarat High Court

Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... vs M/S Mahavir Dyeing & Printing Mills - ... on 23 July, 2009

Author: K.S.Radhakrishnan

Bench: K.S.Radhakrishnan

TAXAP/152020/2008                         1/2                                      ORDER


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       TAX APPEAL No. 1520 of 2008


=========================================================
   COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS SURAT-I -
                        Appellant(s)
                           Versus
     M/S MAHAVIR DYEING & PRINTING MILLS - Opponent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance :
MR HARIN P RAVAL for Appellant(s) : 1,
None for Opponent(s) : 1,
=========================================================
                       HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.
            CORAM :
                       K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN

                       and

                       HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI



                             Date : 23/07/2009


ORAL ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN) Admit.

Issue notice on the following substantial questions of law:

1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case,  the Tribunal is  justified in placing reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay  High   Court   rendered   in   Om   Textile   Pvt.   Ltd.   Vs.   CCE,   Belapur,  2006(74) RLT 333(Bom)?
2. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is  justified   and   has   committed   error   of   law   in   holding   that  TAXAP/152020/2008 2/2 ORDER irrespective   of   the   fact   of   challenging   of   fixation   of   annual  production   capacity,   the   law   declared   by   the   Hon'ble   Supreme  Court   in   the   case   of   Commissioner   of   Central   Excise   Vs.   SPBL,  2002 (63) RLT 644(SC) has to be taken into account and whether  the Tribunal is justified in setting aside the impugned order and  remanding the matter back to the original adjudicating authority  for decision afresh?

Post the matter along with Tax Appeal No.509/2008.

(K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,C.J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) (raghu)