Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench

Mashooq Ahmad Lone vs Mohammad Saleem Ganaie on 30 June, 2022

Author: Sindhu Sharma

Bench: Sindhu Sharma

                                                                                      S. No. 30
                                                                                      Regular Cause List
                          THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                           AT SRINAGAR

                                                 CM(M) no. 121/2020
                                                  CM no. 6714/2020

               Mashooq Ahmad Lone                                            ...Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

               Through: None

                                                            Vs.
               Mohammad Saleem Ganaie                                                    ...Respondent(s)

               Through: Mr. Arif Sikander, Advocate

               CORAM:
                               HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
                                                       ORDER

30.06.2022 In this petition, the petitioner has assailed order dated 31.12.2019, passed by Principal District Judge, Anantnag in a Suit under Order 37 CPC titled Mohammad Saleem Ganaie versus Mashooq Ahmad Lone, by virtue of which application seeking leave to defend the suit filed by the defendants/respondents herein has been granted subject to condition that he will deposit the cash security of Rs. 30,20,000/- in the shape of Bank guarantee to the extent of Rs. 15,20,000/- and non-banking guarantee to the extent of Rs. 15,00,000/- in the name of court or demand draft within a period of one and a half month.

This Court vide order dated 29.12.2020 had directed the Trial court to proceed with the matter, however, condition of the deposit of cash security of Rs. 30,20,000/- in the shape of bank guarantee and non-bank guarantee in the order dated 31.12.2019 was stayed till next date.

Mr. Arif Sikander appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that this petition has become infructuous as the suit has been finally decided and disposed of vide order dated 13.03.2020. Copy of the judgment is placed on record.

Counsel for the petitioner on 20.04.2021 had sought time to seek instructions as he was informed that decree has been passed. Today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, since the suit has been finally decided vide order dated 13.03.2020, this petition has become infructuous and as such is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE IMTIYAZ UL GANI SRINAGAR 2022.07.05 08:48 I attest to the accuracy and 30.06.2022 integrity of this document "Imtiyaz"