Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 6 August, 2021

Author: Rumi Kumari Phukan

Bench: Rumi Kumari Phukan

                                                                      Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010104852021




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : Crl.Pet./384/2021

            MONJUMA GOGOI TAMULI AND ANR
            W/O SRI BIRINCHI KUMAR TAMULI,
            R/O HOUSE NO.
            KALYANI NAGAR, KALAPAHAR, GUWAHATI-781019, P.O., P.S. -
            DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM

            2: SRI UTTAM BORAH
             SON OF LATE INDRESWAR BORAH
            R/O ROYAL PARK
             50
             G.S. ROAD
             10TH MILE
             NEAR MONIFORT SCHOOL
             P.O. AMERIGOG
             P.S. BASISTHA
             GUWAHATI-781023
             DIST. KAMRUP (METRO)
            ASSA

            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
            REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM

            2:MRS. PRIYAMA GOSWAMI
            W/O SRI BHISHAN RAI
            R/O HOUSE NO. 117
            LAKHIMI NAGAR
             HATIGAON ROAD
             P.S. HATIGAON
             KAMRUP (METRO)
            ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. I CHOWDHURY SR ADV
                                                                                       Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




                                      BEFORE
                     HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN


                                             ORDER

06.08.2021.

By way of this application under Section 482 of the CrPC, the two petitioners, who have been arrayed as accused in the FIR, pertaining to the Dispur P.S. Case No.1843/2021, under Sections 120(B)/188/336/420/506 of the IPC, sought for quashing of the FIR, on the ground that they have all the necessary documents in their favour and that they have been wrongly arrayed as accused, for which the FIR is not maintainable.

I have heard the submissions of Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. Also perused the documents annexed.

Let a notice be issued to the respondent No. 2 by registered post with A/D as well as by usual process.

Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has appeared on behalf of the respondent No.1/State of Assam. Hence, no formal notice needs to be issued. Necessary extra copies be furnished to her.

Let the scan copy of the Case Diary along with the relevant statement of the informant and the witnesses be called for and list the matter on 19.08.2021, along with the Crl. Petition No.369/2021.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant