Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vrinda Sharad Bal And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra Thr The Secretary ... on 14 September, 2023

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                          908-ASWP-230-2022.DOC




                                                                                 Wadhwa



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                    WRIT PETITION NO. 230 OF 2022


 Vrinda Sharad Bal & Anr                                             ...Petitioners
        Versus
 State of Maharashtra & Ors                                        ...Respondents


 Mr Virag Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Siddhesh Bhole,
      Ashwin Pimpale, i/b SSB Legal & Advisory, for the Petitioners.
 Mrs R M Shinde, AGP, for the Respondent-State.


                               CORAM      G.S. Patel &
                                          Kamal Khata, JJ.
                               DATED:     14th September 2023
 PC:-


1. The issue in this Petition appears to us to be a narrow question of interpretation of law.

2. We may summarise it thus: is it permissible or legitimate in town planning law for a later and more restrictive planning or zoning regulation to be applied with retrospective effect?

3. This is the first point that Mr Tulzapurkar, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner places for our consideration along with a second argument, in the alternative, that even if they challenge to Page 1 of 2 14th September 2023 ::: Uploaded on - 15/09/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 16/09/2023 02:43:32 ::: 908-ASWP-230-2022.DOC the vires or the validity fails, the Petitioners are covered by an exclusion in the impugned notification itself.

4. We note this because it does not seem to us that there is any great controversy on facts that would require a substantive Affidavit in Reply.

5. For some reason that we are unable to understand, although this Petition was filed in 2022 and the Petitioners have privately served the Pune Municipal Corporation ("PMC"), Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, none appears for the PMC and the office noting is that the PMC is unserved.

6. The Registry will ensure that the PMC is served urgently by courier. In addition to service through Court, we permit fresh service privately including by email and courier. A copy of this order must accompany the notice. Hamdast is allowed.

7. We list the matter on 5th October 2023, high on board for directions. We do so simply because on that date we propose to fix a peremptory date for final disposal of the Petition itself at the stage of admission.

 (Kamal Khata, J)                                              (G. S. Patel, J)




                                   Page 2 of 2
                               14th September 2023


::: Uploaded on - 15/09/2023                         ::: Downloaded on - 16/09/2023 02:43:32 :::