Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

North Gujarat Unit Of Association Of ... vs North Gujarat Pathologists ... on 12 September, 2017

Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, Abhay Manohar Sapre, Navin Sinha

                                                  1

     ITEM NO.3                           COURT NO.3                SECTION III

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)               No(s).   28529/2010

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-09-2010
     in SCA No. 17485/2006 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
     Ahmedabad)

     NORTH GUJARAT UNIT OF ASSOCIATION
     OF SELF EMPLOYED OWNERS
     (PARAMEDICAL) OF PRIVATE PATHOLOGY
     LABORATORIES OF GUJARAT                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     NORTH GUJARAT PATHOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION & ORS                   Respondent(s)
     WITH
     SLP(C) No. 6325/2009 (IV-A)
     FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2008)

     SLP(C) No. 6323/2009 (IV-A)
     (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2008)

     SLP(C) No. 6322/2009 (IV-A)
     (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2008
     FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2009)

     SLP(C) No. 6324/2009 (IV-A)
     (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2008)

     SLP(C) No. 8147/2009 (IV-A)

     SLP(C) No. 32596/2010 (III)

     Date : 12-09-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

     For Parties                   Mr.   Ranjit Kumar, SG
                                   Mr.   Atulesh Kumar, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                   Ms.   Binu Tamta, Adv.
Digitally signed by
NEETU KHAJURIA
Date: 2017.09.14
                                   Mr.   G.S. Makker, Adv.
18:44:45 IST
Reason:


                                   Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR
                                   Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv.
                                   Ms. Astha Deep, Adv.
                          2


           Mr. B. S. Banthia, AOR

           Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR
           Mr. Ankit Kr. Lal, Adv.

           Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR

           Mr. Manoj K. Mishra, AOR
           Mr. Umesh Dubey, Adv.

           Mr.   Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.
           Mr.   Gaurav Sharma, AOR
           Mr.   Prateek Bhatia, Adv.
           Mr.   Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
           Ms.   Amandeep Kaur, Adv.
           Ms.   Deepeeka Kalia, Adv.

            Mr. Amit Kumar, AOR

            Ms. Minakshi Vij, AOR

           Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra-I, AOR
           Mr. Pranjal Kishore, Adv.
           Mr. S. Nithin, Adv.

           Mr.   Abhinav Mukerji, AOR
           Ms.   Bihu Sharma, Adv.
           Ms.   Purnima Krishna, Adv.
           Mr.   Siddharth Garg, Adv.

           Ms.   Hemantika Wahi, AOR
           Ms.   Puja Singh, Adv.
           Ms.   Mamta Singh, Adv.
           Ms.   Shodhika Sharma, Adv.

           Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR
           Ms. Parul Sharma, Adv.


 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                    O R D E R

Learned Solicitor General, who has appeared in these cases, has drawn the attention of the Court to the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016, which is stated to be under consideration.

3

Learned solicitor has also pointed out that certain guidelines under Section 12 of the Act read with Rule 9(3) of the Rules have been circulated and objections have been invited. The said guidelines are available on record.

It is further submitted that various associations have participated in the discussions and the guidelines presently are at draft stage and will be finalized soon.

We have perused the said guidelines and it is our considered view that guidelines Nos. 5.4 and 5.5, if finalized, will adequately take care of the issues arising subject to the concerned states choosing to adopt the provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder as contemplated under Section 1(3) and Section 56 of the Act. To enable the exercise to be completed we adjourn the cases to 6th December, 2017 by which date the learned Solicitor General will inform the Court about the progress achieved in respect of finalization of the guidelines as well as the amendments proposed to the Act.

 (NEETU KHAJURIA)                                  (ASHA SONI)
   COURT MASTER                                  BRANCH OFFICER