Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S.Monnaie Interior Designers (P) Ltd vs The State Tax Officer (Wc/Lt) on 30 July, 2020

Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

Bench: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

           THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2020/8TH SRAVANA, 1942

                         W.P(C).No.15520 OF 2020


PETITIONER:

                M/S.MONNAIE INTERIOR DESIGNERS (P) LTD.
                12/7 (11 & 12) HI CENTRE, OPP. INDIRA
                GANDHI MUNCIPAL STADIUM, COIMBATORE ROAD,
                PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
                PRAGABHALDAS K.V.

                BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
                SMT.MEERA V.MENON
                SMT.K.KRISHNA

RESPONDENTS:

       1        THE STATE TAX OFFICER (WC/LT)
                DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

       2        THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
                TAX TOWERS, KILLIPPALAM, KARAMANA,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002.

                BY SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER

         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
    ON 30.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
    FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).No.15520/2020                 :: 2 ::




                               JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P5 and P5(a) assessment orders under the KVAT Act. Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition in its challenge against the orders impugned, I find that against Exts.P5 and P5(a) orders the petitioners have an effective alternate remedy by way of an appeal before the First Appellate Authority. I do not find Exts.P5 and P5(a) orders to be vitiated by any error of jurisdiction or violation of natural justice so as to entertain this writ petition against the said orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to move the appellate authority in its challenge against Exts.P5 and P5(a) assessment orders, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

                                 A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
                                             JUDGE


Sd
 W.P.(C).No.15520/2020          :: 3 ::




                             APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.

EXT.P1(A): COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16.

EXT.P2: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.37572/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXT.P3: COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.

EXT.P3(A): COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16.

EXT.P4: COPY OF REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4(A): COPY OF REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5: COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.

EXT.P5(A): COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE