Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh

Kamlesh Malik vs Indian Council Of Agricultural ... on 29 May, 2018

Author: P. Gopinath

Bench: P. Gopinath

                                   1
                                                 (OA No.060/00643/2018)


             CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                   CHANDIGARH BENCH
                            ...

         ORIGINAL APPLICATION N0.060/00643/2018

           Chandigarh, this the 29th day of May, 2018
                               ...

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SULLAR, MEMBER (J)
           HON'BLE MS. P. GOPINATH, MEMBER (A)
                            ...

Kamlesh Malik, aged about 56 years, W/o Late Anand Singh Malik,
R/o House No.23-ZF, Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, presently working as
Assistant at ICAR Indian Institute of Maize Research, PAU Campus,
Ludhiana (Group-B).
                                                       ....APPLICANT

(Present: Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate)

                               VERSUS

1.   Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, Dr.
     Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi through its Secretary.
2.   ICAR-Indian   Council    of   Maize   Research,   PAU   Campus,
     Ludhiana, through its Director.
3.   Administrative Officer, ICAR-Indian Council of Maize Research,
     PAU Campus, Ludhiana.
                                                  ....RESPONDENTS

                             ORDER (Oral)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SULLAR, MEMBER (J):-

The main contention of learned counsel, at this stage, is that, although the applicant has issued legal notice dated 15.01.2018 (Annexure A-17), for redressal of her grievances, but no decision has yet been taken on it by the Competent Authority.

Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant, having gone through the record with her valuable assistance, after considering the entire matter and without expressing any opinion 2 (OA No.060/00643/2018) on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side, during the course of further consideration of the matter, the main instant Original Application is disposed of with the direction to the Competent Authority amongst the respondents to sympathetically consider and decide the prayer of the applicant contained in the indicated legal notice, by passing a speaking & reasoned order and in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

          (P. GOPINATH)                    (JUSTICE M.S. SULLAR)
           MEMBER (A)                           MEMBER (J)

                                                     Dated: 29.05.2018.
`rishi'