Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rushikesh Ramesh More vs The State Of Maharashtra on 30 April, 2021

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 BOM 1478

Author: Sadhana S. Jadhav

Bench: Sadhana S. Jadhav

                                                                                       12.ba13335.2021.doc



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1335 OF 2021
    Rushikesh Ramesh More.                                       ... Applicant
    V/s.
    State of Maharashtra.                                        ... Respondent.
                                         -------------------
    Mr. Prashant M. Patil, advocate for applicant.
    Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for State.
                                         ---------------------
                                 CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV.
                                      DATE : APRIL 30, 2021.
                                                (Through Video Conferencing)


P.C.
1                Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the

learned APP for State.



2                This is an application under section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking enlargement on bail.                              The applicant

herein is arrested on 14/8/2020 in Crime No. 190 of 2020 registered

at Ghodegaon Police Station, Pune Rural for offence punishable under

section 302, 201, 397, 364 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet is filed.



Talwalkar                                                                                       1 of 4




       ::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2021                               ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 12:43:12 :::
                                                                        12.ba13335.2021.doc



3               It is the case that one Balu Lande had lodged a missing

complaint in respect of his brother Sudam Lande @ Appa.                       It was

contended that on 22/6/2020 the applicant was informed by his wife

that Sudam had left the house at about 5 p.m. and had not returned.

On the basis of the said report, missing Complaint No. 12 of 2020 was

registered.



4               On 13/8/2020 Akshay Sudam Lande, son of the missing

person lodged a report at the police station alleging that on 25/6/2020

he was telephonically informed that a dead body of Sudam Lande was

found at Walunjwadi. The body was sent for autopsy. All the relatives

were present for funeral. It is contended in the FIR that Vicky Erande

was missing ever since the dead body of Sudam Lande was found.

The report was lodged at the police station and on 13/8/2020. They

were called by Manchar Police station and informed that the golden

chain adorned by the deceased on 22/6/2020 and Rs. 3000/- to

4,000/- were missing and that the police have found Rishikesh More

i.e. present applicant who had come to call Sudam Lande on

22/6/2020 and it has transpired that Vicky Erande had asked the

present applicant to call            Sudam Lande and they had taken him


Talwalkar                                                                       2 of 4




      ::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2021                ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 12:43:12 :::
                                                                       12.ba13335.2021.doc



alongwith him to forest area. It had also transpired that Vicky Erande

had assaulted Sudam with hammer and had taken away his golden

chain and money. On the basis of the said report, the applicant was

arrested on 14/8/2020.



5               Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in fact,

Sudam Lande was missing since 22/6/2020, whereas FIR is lodged on

13/8/2020. That the allegation of the assault is against Vicky Erande.

The only role assigned to the applicant is that he has come to call

Sudam Lande on 22/6/2021. The statement of Dynaneshwar Baban

Lande were recorded and he had stated that one unknown boy had

come to call Sudam and that they had seen one boy going towards

Manchar alongwith Sudam Lande.



6               Prima facie, it appears that the applicant was arrested on

suspicion. In any case, investigation is completed and charge-sheet is

filed. Hence, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.                 Hence,

following order is passed :

                                     ORDER

(i) The application is allowed.

Talwalkar                                                                      3 of 4




      ::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2021               ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 12:43:12 :::
                                                                              12.ba13335.2021.doc




(ii)              The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond

in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount.

(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.

(iv) The application is disposed of accordingly.





                                       (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)




Talwalkar                                                                             4 of 4




        ::: Uploaded on - 30/04/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 12:43:12 :::