Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Inhabitants Of Village Taraf Manjli And vs State Of J&K And Others on 31 March, 2022

Author: Vinod Chatterji Koul

Bench: Vinod Chatterji Koul

                                                                        Sr. No. 4

       HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                       AT JAMMU
                                                          OWP No. 157/2013
                                                          CM No. 6247/2020
                                                          IA No. 173/2013

Inhabitants of Village Taraf Manjli and                    .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
others


                          Through: Mr. V Bhushan Gupta, Advocate

                   Vs

State of J&K and others                                              ..... Respondent(s)

                          Through: Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
                                   Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG

Coram:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE

                                          ORDER

A perusal of the file reveals that objections have already been filed by the respondents in 2013.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he had been assured by the respondents that road would be constructed on the basis of old alignment. In view of such assurance, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with a liberty that in case, respondents change alignment or deviate from their assurance, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file afresh petition.

Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the prayer of the petitioners.

Therefore, in view of submissions made, petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file afresh in case, cause of action still survives or fresh cause of action accrues.

(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Jammu 31.03.2022 Neha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No