Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

E.Malarkodi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 November, 2019

Author: M.Dhandapani

Bench: M.Dhandapani

                                                                               W.P.No.33439 of 2019

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   Dated :29.11.2019


                                                         CORAM

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                                W.P.No.33439 of 2019
                                                         and
                                                W.M.P.No.33903 of 2019


                      E.Malarkodi                                                    ... Petitioner
                                                           Vs.

                      1.The State of Tamil Nadu
                      Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government
                      Higher Education Department
                      Secretariat, Fort St. George
                      Chennai-600 009.

                      2.The Director of Collegiate Education
                      DPI Campus, College road
                      Chennai-600 006.

                      3.The Chairman
                      Teachers Recruitment Board
                      4th floor, E.V.K.Sampath maaligai
                      DPI Campus, College road
                      Chennai-600 006.                                           ... Respondents



                            Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
                      of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for
                      the records relating to the impugned Notification issued by the 3 rd
                      respondent     in   Notification   No.12/2019,   dated    28.08.2019     and
                      04.10.2019 and to quash the same insofar as clause 15 relates to


                      1/9



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                             W.P.No.33439 of 2019

                      yardstick for awarding marks for Teaching Experience and the relevant
                      Annexure    in   Format-I/II/III-A   (Annexure)     Teaching   Experience-
                      consolidated is concerned and consequently directing the respondents
                      to award marks for each year of Teaching Experience from the date of
                      appointment of the petitioner in the respective post with requisite
                      qualification prescribed by University Grants Commission Regulations
                      for selection to the post of Assistant Professor.


                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.S.Mohanavadivelan
                                  For Respondents : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu, Spl.G.P. for R1 & 2
                                                    Mr.C.Munusamy, Spl.G.P. (Edn) for R3


                                                     ORDER

The above writ petition is filed challenging to call for the records relating to the impugned Notification issued by the 3rd respondent in Notification No.12/2019, dated 28.08.2019 and 04.10.2019 and to quash the same insofar as clause 15 relates to yardstick for awarding marks for Teaching Experience and the relevant Annexure in Format- I/II/III-A (Annexure) Teaching Experience- consolidated is concerned and consequently directing the respondents to award marks for each year of Teaching Experience from the date of appointment of the petitioner in the respective post with requisite qualification prescribed by University Grants Commission Regulations for selection to the post of Assistant Professor.

2/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019

2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was given appointment to the Guest Lecturer post based on the eligibility with reference to educational qualification prescribed as per University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations. The eligible qualification prescribed for calculating teaching experience remains that P.G. with 55% minimum marks with NET / SLET, Exemption for M.Phil., for taking U.G. classes and Ph.D for taking P.G. classes. The 3 rd respondent TRB issued Notification No.12/2019 dated 04.10.2019 for direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor in Government Arts and Science College with date of commencement of application through online mode as 04.10.2019 and the last date for submission of application fixed as 30.10.2019, and it has been again extended till 15.11.2019 followed by Certificate Verification and Interview would be announced later. Hence the petitioner prays quashing of the impugned Notification issued by the 3rd respondent in Notification No.12/2019, dated 28.08.2019 and 04.10.2019.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 submitted in their counter that for the purpose of determination of teaching experience, this Court has already passed order dated 3/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019 12.07.2013 in W.P.No.18186 of 2013. The said order is taken as letter and spirit of law, the order was implemented and the same shall be the yardstick for determination of teaching experience. The following are the qualifications for more than 25 years and the same shall be taken for awarding marks for the teaching experience. S.No. Date Qualification prescribed by UGC for appointment of Lecturers in College/Universities

1. Before PG with 50% minimum marks 1991

2. 19.09.1991 PG with 55% minimum marks with Pass NET/SLET

3. 1993 PG with 55% minimum marks with Pass NET/SLET Exemption for those who completed M.Phil before 31.12.1993 (or) submitted Ph.D. dissertation before 31.12.1993

4. 31.07.2002 PG with 55% marks with NET/SLET. Exemption for Ph.D. dissertation submitted before 31.12.2002

5. 14.06.2006 PG with 55% minimum marks with NET/SLET.

Exemption for M.Phil for taking UG class and Ph.D. for taking PG class

6. 30.06.2010 PG with 55% minimum marks with NET/SLET Exemption only for Ph.D. holders.

4.The learned counsel further submitted that this Court has also issued a direction to the Recruitment Board to clarify the candidates by way of notification in the newspapers that during relevant period, the qualification mentioned above at the relevant point of time can be considered for awarding marks for teaching experience. Immediately, 4/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019 thereafter, the Government issued letter No.12258A/F2/2013-3, dated 31.07.2013 regarding clarification on the implementation of the order of this Court dated 12.07.2013 made in W.P.No.18186 of 2013 and the same has been clarified. The said order has been complied with, since it is in conformity with the guidelines laid down by University Grants Commission for such recruitments of Assistant Professor post. A person to obtain a minimum qualification at the relevant point of time prescribed by UGC as mentioned above. The teaching experience shall appropriately be calculated to the above prescribed qualification.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent stated in his counter that Yardstick for awarding marks for teaching experience is based on the judgment passed in W.P.No.18186 of 2013 dated 12.07.2013 that the teaching experience cannot be tested based on the requisite qualification by the UGC Regulations for the subsequent period.

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

5/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019

6.The issue involved in the writ petition is whether the scheme of selection for awarding weightage marks for teaching experience, qualification and interview is valid or note?

7.This Court perused the Annexure to the Notification contains Format-I/II/III-A prescribing qualification for awarding weightage marks for teaching experience with reference to the relevant year. It is given in consolidated format. There are 29 columns and cumulative reading of the Format, Division Bench judgment of this Court, qualifications prescribed in the Notification and clause 15 of the Notification, which relates to the teaching experience certificate and countersigning authority, makes it clear that a person who possess Post Graduate with 55 marks with NET/SLET/CISR after 19.09.1991 is eligible to participate in the selection process. Each compartment will give marks with experience gained by experienced teachers. This Court did not find any irregularity in the Format annexed along with the Notification. That format is in consonance with the qualifications prescribed in the Notification as well as order of this Court. Yardstick for awarding marks for teaching experience is based on the judgment passed in W.P.No.18186 of 2013 dated 12.07.2013 and the said order was implemented by the Government. Further, in respect of awarding 6/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019 weightage marks for teaching experience, qualification and interview, the yardsticks were upheld by the Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions.

8.Thus, for the forgoing reasons, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

29.11.2019 kas To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government Higher Education Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Collegiate Education DPI Campus, College road Chennai-600 006.

3.The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board 4th floor, E.V.K.Sampath maaligai DPI Campus, College road Chennai-600 006.

7/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019 M.DHANDAPANI, J.

kas W.P.No.33439 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.33903 of 2019 8/9 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.No.33439 of 2019 29.11.2019 9/9 http://www.judis.nic.in