Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Satish Kumar on 3 November, 2022

Bench: S. Abdul Nazeer, V. Ramasubramanian

                                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.102 OF 2021


                         STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR                             ...Appellant(s)

                                                          Vs.


                         SATISH KUMAR & ORS.                                    ...Respondent(s)



                                                  O R D E R

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. We do not see any cogent reason to entertain the appeal. The judgment impugned does not warrant any interference.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

......................J. [S.ABDUL NAZEER] ......................J. [V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN] New Delhi;

November 3, 2022.





Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Anita Malhotra
Date: 2022.11.05
12:19:31 IST
Reason:




                                                          1
ITEM NO.102                   COURT NO.4                      SECTION XVI-A

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal    No(s).   102/2021

STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR                                    Appellant(s)

                                    VERSUS

SATISH KUMAR & ORS.                                           Respondent(s)

([ FIXED DATE MATTER ]

IA No. 129659/2022 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION) Date : 03-11-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Shailesh Madiyal,Adv.
Mr. Vinayaka S.Pandit,Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal,Adv. Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin Sangra,Adv.
Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application also stands disposed of.



    (ANITA MALHOTRA)                          (KAMLESH RAWAT)
       AR-CUM-PS                                COURT MASTER
(Signed order is placed on the file.) 2