Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam

Chithra A.C vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 23 June, 2011

      

  

  

                 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                            ERNAKULAM BENCH

                            O.A. NO. 152 OF 2011

                Thursday, this the 23rd day of June, 2011

CORAM:
           HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
           HON'BLE Mr. K.GEORGE JOSEPH, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

Chithra A.C
Residing at Sasthagiri, Kizhakkenela PO
Paripally - 691 574                              ...     Applicant

(By Advocate Mr. V.Sajith Kumar      )

                               versus

1.         Union of India represented by the Secretary
           tp the Government, Ministry of Communications
           Department of Post, Government of India
           New Delhi - 110 001

2.         The Chief Postmaster General
           Kerala Circle, Trivandrum - 695 001

3.         The Senior Superintendent of Post Office,
           Kollam Postal Division
           Kollam - 691 001                      ...     Respondents

(By Advocate Mr.S.Jamal, ACGSC         )

           The application having been heard on 23.06.2011, the Tribunal
on the same day delivered the following:

                                 O R D E R

HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER The prayer in the OA is for a direction to 1st respondent to finalise the selection proceedings and issue appointment order accommodating the applicant against vacancies of GDSBPM/MC, Chirakkarathazham with all consequential benefits.

2. The applicant is an aspirant to the said post of GDSBPM/MC, Chirakkarathazham and the grievance raised is against the inordinate delay in finalising the selection process. Respondents in the reply statement has submitted that pursuant to Annexure A-4 complaint filed by the applicant, an enquiry was conducted and after detailed enquiry, review of selection process is made and appointment of one Dhanya earlier selected, was cancelled and decision has been taken to appoint the applicant and pursuant thereto orders appointing the applicant vide memo dated 12.05.2011 has been issued. Since the grievance of the applicant has been redressed there is no lis for adjudication. OA is dismissed. No costs.

           Dated, the 23rd June,     2011.




K GEORGE JOSEPH                                   JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER                              JUDICIAL MEMBER




vs