Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Mrs.U.V.Zuhara vs The Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax on 23 March, 2009

Bench: C.N.Ramachandran Nair, K.Surendra Mohan

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

ITA.No. 36 of 2009()



1. MRS.U.V.ZUHARA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.P.MOHANDAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :23/03/2009

 O R D E R
     C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                I.T.A. NO: 36 OF 2009
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Dated this the 23rd March, 2009.

                                         JUDGMENT

RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

Even though various questions are raised in the appeal filed by the assessee, we notice that the only issue pertains to estimation of percentage of gross profit for determining the income for the relevant year. The assessee has no dispute with regard to the unaccounted turnover estimated during the block period pursuant to search. Even though assessee offered undisclosed income at 10% the assessing officer noticed that percentage of gross profit for the earlier years was much higher. The assessing officer therefore adopted the gross profit at the same percentage returned by the assessee in the previous years and completed the assessment. This is confirmed by the first appellate authority as well as by the Tribunal. We do not find any substantial question of law arising from the order of the Tribunal because there is no dispute with regard to the unaccounted turnover determined by the assessing officer based on information gathered on search. So far as the rate of gross profit is concerned, the authorities have only I.T.A.No: 36/2009 2 adopted the same rate of profit declared by the assessee for the earlier years. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.

----------------------------------------------------

M.F.A.NO:

-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT Dated: