Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Pioneer Property Management Ltd vs Amazon Sellers Services Private ... on 7 December, 2020

Author: Moushumi Bhattacharya

Bench: Moushumi Bhattacharya

ODC-1
                                ORDER SHEET

                                 CS 2 of 2016

                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                       Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                ORIGINAL SIDE


                PIONEER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD.
                              Versus
           AMAZON SELLERS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.


 BEFORE:
 The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA

Date : 7th December, 2020. [Via Video Conference] Appearance:

Mrs. Suparna Mukherjee, Adv.
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Adv.
Mr. Shankarsan Sarkar, Adv.
Mr. Ratul Das, Adv.
... for the plaintiff Mr. Malay Kumar Ghosh, Sr. Adv.
... for the defendant no. 1 Ms. Sonal Shah, Adv.
Mr. Kushagra Shah, Adv.
... for the defendant no. 2 The Court : The advocate-on-record of the defendant no. 2 is physically present in Court and submits that his witness was due to be cross- examined by learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff.
Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff and the defendant no.1 both agree that the cross-examination of the witness of the second defendant had commenced and was due to continue on the returnable date before the functioning of the Court was disrupted due to the pandemic. 2
Since it has been submitted by the advocate-on-record of the second defendant that his witness resides in Gurgaon and that presently the office of the witness of the second defendant is shut, sufficient adjournment is sought in the matter.
In view of the submissions made, list this matter on 11th January, 2021, as prayed for.
It should be mentioned that learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks that the cross-examination be conducted in the physical form and not on the virtual platform. Hence, sufficient time is being given to the witness of the defendant no.2 to make arrangements to physically appear before the Court on the next date.
(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.) RS