Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Ruby Nalini vs The State on 16 August, 2019

Author: N. Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N. Anand Venkatesh

                                                        1                Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 16.08.2019

                                                      CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                           Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016



                      S.Ruby Nalini                                                ... Petitioner

                                                     Vs.


                      1.The State,
                        Represented by The Director General of Police,
                        Office of the Director General of Police,
                        Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
                        Mylapore,
                        Chennai-600 004.

                      2.The Commissioner of Police,
                        Office of the Commissioner of Police,
                        Vepery,
                        Chennai-600 007.

                      3.The State, rep.by
                        The Inspector of Police,
                        R-1, Mambalam Police Station,
                        T.Nagar, Chennai.

                      4.The State, rep.by
                        The Inspector of Police,
                        CBCID Office,
                        Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

                                                                                ... Respondents

http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1/6
                                                          2               Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016

                      Prayer:   This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
                      Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1st respondent police to further
                      direct to transfer the investigation to CBCID (4th respondent and
                      expedite the investigation and find the real culprits in Crime No.1971 of
                      2014, pending on the file of the 3rd respondent.


                                         For Petitioner       : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj

                                         For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
                                                           Additional Public Prosecutor



                                                     ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to transfer the investigation in Cr.No.1971 of 2014, pending on the file of the 3rd respondent.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was getting down from the bus on 21.12.2014 and at that point of time, started getting messages in her mobile phone to the effect that money has been withdrawn by using her ATM Card to an extent of Rs.1,11,000/-. The petitioner immediately gave a complaint to the respondent Police. It was also recorded in the CCTV at four ATM Centres where the ATM Card was used and it was found that the same ladies had used the ATM Card and swindled the amount. http://www.judis.nic.in 2/6 3 Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that even though the incident had taken place in the year 2014, there was absolutely no progress in the investigation, and therefore the present petition has been filed seeking for transfer of investigation to CBCID.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions, submitted that the case is still under investigation and the respondent Police are not able to trace the accused persons.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the 3 rd respondent is not effectively investigating this case, inspite of the fact that the faces of the accused persons is clearly revealed in the CCTV Camera at four ATM Centres, where the ATM Card belonging to the petitioner was misused. Therefore, this Court is inclined to transfer the investigation from the file of the 3rd respondent.

6.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to hand over the entire case diary to the Deputy Commissioner, CCB, Chennai, within a period of two weeks from http://www.judis.nic.in 3/6 4 Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016 the date of receipt of copy of this order. Immediately, on receipt of the case diary, the Deputy Commissioner, CCB, Chennai, shall allot this case to the concerned team which specialise in such Credit Card/ATM Card frauds. The investigation shall be completed within a period of four months, thereafter a Final Report shall be filed by bringing all the accused persons to book and the money shall be recovered from them.

16.08.2019 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No KP http://www.judis.nic.in 4/6 5 Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016 To

1.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

3.The Inspector of Police, R-1, Mambalam Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai.

4.The Deputy Commissioner, CCB, Chennai.

5.The Inspector of Police, CBCID Office, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5/6 6 Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016 N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

KP Crl.O.P.No.17084 of 2016 16.08.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 6/6