Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V.K.Abdul Rahim vs P.T.John on 31 January, 2017

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

     TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2017/11TH MAGHA, 1938

                   OP(C).No. 2820 of 2016 (O)
                   ---------------------------

     EP.NO.91/2016 IN OS.NO.234/2014 OF SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
                             ......

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

     1.    V.K.ABDUL RAHIM, AGED 69, S/O.LATE KUNJALI NAINA,
           CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, SARGAM BUILDERS
           PVT. LIMITED, SARGAM HOUSE, WATER LAND ROAD,
           KOCHI - 682 020.

     2.    SAVEEN ABUBACKER, S/O.ABUBACKER,
           EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SARGAM BUILDERS PVT. LIMITED,
           SARGAM HOUSE, WATER LAND ROAD,
           KOCHI - 682 020.

            BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)
                   SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI
                   SMT.ASHA BABU
                   SMT.R.S.ASWINI SANKAR

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.    P.T.JOHN, S/O.LATE P.G.THOMAS, AGED 78,
           DOOR # III/774, HOUSE # 7, PLAVUNKAL,
           MERIDIAN GARDENS, THRIKKAKARA P.O.,
           KOCHI - 682 021.

     2.    ALIVE JOHN, AGED 67, W/O.P.T.JOHN,
           DOOR # III/774, HOUSE # 7, PLAVUNKAL
           MERIDIAN GARDENS, THRIKKAKARA P.O.,
           KOCHI - 682 021.

     3.    M/S.SARGAM BUILDERS (P) LIMITED,
           SARGAM HOUSE, WATER LAND ROAD, KADAVANTHRA,
           KOCHI - 682 020, REPRESENTED BY SHRI.V.K.ABDUL RAHIM,
           CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Msv/

                                                              -2-

                               -2-

OP(C).No. 2820 of 2016 (O)
--------------------------

     4.    RAZIA, RAHIM, D/O.SRI.V.K.ABDUL RAHIM,
           DIRECTOR, SARGAM BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,
           SARGAM HOUSE, WATER LAND ROAD, KOCHI - 682 020.

  *  5.    ANOOJA RAHIM, D/O. V.K.ABDUL RAHIM,
           DIRECTOR, SARGAM BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,
           SARGAM HOUSE, WATER LAND ROAD,
           KOCHI - 682 020. (DELETED)

     *     R5 IS DELETED FROM PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE
           PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DTD.7.12.2016 IN IA.1720/2016.


            R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.E.M.JOSEPH

       THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
       ON 31-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:


msv/

OP(C).No. 2820 of 2016 (O)
--------------------------

                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

P1   TRUE COPY OF ORDER DTD.17.10.2016 EP.NO.91/2016 IN
     OS.234/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, ERNAKULAM

P2   TRUE COPY OF PETITION DTD.16.8.2016 BY THE RESPONDENTS.

P3   TRUE COPY OF DRAFT SALE PROCLAMATION DTD.7.9.2016 IN
     EP.NO.91/2016 IN OS.NO.234.

P4   TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION DTD.18.10.2016 IN EP.NO. 91/2016 IN
     OS.234/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

                           NIL

                                      //TRUE COPY//


                                      P.S.TO JUDGE
Msv/



                   A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                 =========================
                       O.P.(C).No.2820/2016
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               Dated this the 31st day of January, 2017


                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are the judgment debtors in E.P.No.91/2016 in O.S.No.234/2014. They have filed an appeal as A.S.No.128/2016 against the decree in O.S.No.234/2014 before the Additional District Court-I, Ernakulam along with an application for stay and an application for condonation of delay.

2. In that view of the matter, with liberty to the petitioners to move the Additional District Court-I, Ernakulam for stay, the original petition is disposed of. However, the interim order passed by this court will continue for a period of two weeks or till disposal of the stay application along with the delay condonation application, whichever period is earlier. No costs.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms