Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Shree Shail Dundappa Taranahalli vs Sri B R Hosur on 26 September, 2016

Author: K.N.Phaneendra

Bench: K.N.Phaneendra

                                 -1-
                                              CCC No.524/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016

                            PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

                                 AND

      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA

                CCC No.524/2016 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:

SRI SHREE SHAIL DUNDAPPA TARANAHALLI
AGED 68 YEARS, S/O DUNDAPPA
ADVOCATE, (RETIRED) SPP
R/AT 'A' BLOCK, B-8
JNANESHWARI APARTMENT
V.T.ROAD, MANGALORE - 575 001                 ... COMPLAINANT

(BY SRI R.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     SRI B. R. HOSUR
       THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION
       (DISPUTES) PROSECUTIONS
       CAUVERY BHAVAN
       BENGALURU - 560 009

2.     SRI NATARAJAN                               Deleted
       SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION-I)
                                                   V/O/D
3.     SRI S. K. PATNAYAK
       SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME               30.06.2016
       (LAW & ORDER)
                                                    ... ACCUSED
(BY SMT. S.SUSHEELA, AGA FOR A-1;
    A2 & A3 ARE DELETED V/C/O DATED 30.06.2016)

       THIS   CCC   IS   FILED   UNDER   ARTICLE   215     OF   THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE
                                     -2-
                                                        CCC No.524/2016
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT,
PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDING
AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER PASSED
IN W.P.NO.5214/2015 (GM-RES) DATED 25.03.2015.

     THIS     CCC     COMING      ON       FOR   ORDERS,       THIS     DAY,
H.G.RAMESH J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                               ORDER

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the record.
2. As could be seen from the endorsement dated 30.08.2016 (Annexure-R1) produced along with the affidavit dated 08.09.2016 of Sri Veerappa, Retired Director of Prosecutions, the order whose disobedience is complained of herein, has now been complied. We have also perused the further affidavit of Sri Veerappa dated 23.09.2016 stating the reasons for the delay in complying the order.
3. Having regard to the facts of the case, no further order is necessary. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

However, the complainant is at liberty to challenge the -3- CCC No.524/2016 consideration made as per Annexure-R1, in accordance with law.

CCC disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE KGR