Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 36]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Bharat Lal Rathore vs Raju Singh Gurjar on 8 May, 2023

Author: Rohit Arya

Bench: Rohit Arya

                                   1

     HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT
                    GWALIOR
                 SINGLE BENCH - I

                   MOTION HEARING
              [COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDERS]
IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1011 ON THE
              BOARD DATED : 08/05/2023
      DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER

        CAUSE TITLES AND APPARANCE AS NOTIFIED

Matters from Sr. No. 1001 to 1011 are listed with office objection(s)

        The Court proposes to pass a common conditional order to
 obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters
 involving similar office objection/default.

 In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within
 the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was
 placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar
 granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/ appellant(s)
 to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of
 office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned
 matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The
 Court granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier
 occasion.

 In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second
 by      the     Registrar      and      third    by       Court),     the
 petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office
 objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last
 opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS' further time is
 granted to the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective
 matters to remove office objection/default and make the matter ready
 for further hearing within that time, failing which the concerned
 petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
 without further reference to the Court.
                                                                                    2

                                                  Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/ default is about
                                                  non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended

period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non- prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II) who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

S.No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1011 23/06/2023 (Anand Pathak) Judge (Dubey) Digitally signed by SUNEEL DUBEY DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA SUNEEL PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=157244b0239a6fd662b29b00a11fc DUBEY 66a5e160f585aa7a92425f380d476b32818, pseudonym=046B231C591E29491F36ABD1 56EBF3A713937186, serialNumber=4009CAE962958E019ADDF0 4E87EFD5C07FA5D0C38532D550F61B5540 1A275B8C, cn=SUNEEL DUBEY Date: 2023.05.09 12:07:06 -07'00'