Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Attakkalari Public Charitable Trust Of ... vs Deputy Director Of Income Tax ... on 21 August, 2013

Author: V.Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

       

  

  

 
 
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

        MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935

                                  WP(C).No. 30275 of 2013 (H)
                                  ---------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

           ATTAKKALARI PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST OF CONTEMPORARY
           PERFORMING ARTS
           KAUSTHUBHAM, MANNIKKATH ROAD, RAVIPURAM
           KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE
           JAYACHANDRAN.P

           BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
                        SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
                        SRI.R.SREEJITH
                        SMT.T.S.VIKEESHA
                        SMT.SULEKHA BEEVI C.S.
                        SMT.ROSIE ATHULYA JOSEPH

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

       1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION),
           RANGE 4 KOCHI - 682 005

       2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-II,
           COCHIN, ERNAKULAM- 682 018

       3. THE STATE OF KERALA,
           RERPESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXES)
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001

           R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX
           R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN

           THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
           09-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
           FOLLOWING:




DCS

WP(C).No. 30275 of 2013 (H)
---------------------------------------

                                          APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21-08-2013 FOR
                    THEYEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST
                    RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
                    THE 2ND RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED U/S 220(6) DATED 21-11-2013
                    BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27-11-2013 ISSUED BY THE
                    BANK TO THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE GARNISHEE NOTICE DATED 31-10-2013
                    ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE BANK

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
                    ON EXHIBIT P3 APPLICATION DATED 04-12-2013

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND
                    RESPONDENT

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL
---------------------------------------


                                                        /TRUE COPY/


                                                        P.A. TO JUDGE




DCS



                       V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
                      -------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.30275 of 2013
                   -------------------------------------
               Dated this the 9th day of December, 2013

                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 order of assessment. The same is accompanied by Ext.P7 petition for stay of recovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is aggrieved by the garnishee proceedings initiated in the meanwhile as evident by Ext. P5 notice.

2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P7 petition with notice to the petitioner within a period of two months. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 order and Ext.P5 notice shall be put on hold and status quo maintained in the meanwhile.

3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition with the judgment before the second respondent for compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of.

SD/-

V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS