Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Amarjit Singh Walia And Anr vs Ut Chandigarh And Anr on 30 June, 2021

Author: Manjari Nehru Kaul

Bench: Manjari Nehru Kaul

205   IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH
                  (through video conferencing)

                                                     CRM-M-51387-2019
                                                     Decided on : 30.06.2021

Amarjit Singh Walia & anr.                                  ...... Petitioners

                                    Versus

UT, Chandigarh & anr.                                       ...... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present :    Mr. Varun Katyal, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

             Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, APP
             UT, Chandigarh.

                          ****

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.120 dated 19.09.2019 under Section 406, 498-A IPC 1860 registered at Police Station Women, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to order dated 03.12.2019, passed by this Court, the petitioners, who are parents-in- law of the complainant, have joined the investigation.

This fact is not disputed by the counsel for the State as well. However, he on instructions from SI Balbir Singh, states that certain dowry articles have yet not been returned by the petitioners.

A perusal of the FIR in question does not reveal that there is any allegation much less whisper against the petitioners of entrustment of any dowry article at the time of the marriage of their son to the complainant.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 01-07-2021 11:23:33 ::: CRM-M-51387-2019 -2- In the circumstances, this Court fails to comprehend as to which jewellery/gold ornaments are required to be recovered from the petitioners.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 03.12.2019, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.




                                                (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)
30.06.2021                                              JUDGE
sonia

               Whether speaking/reasoned:             Yes/No
               Whether reportable :                   Yes/No




                                       2 of 2
                    ::: Downloaded on - 01-07-2021 11:23:34 :::