Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Calcutta High Court

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Cookme [Spice] Pvt. Ltd on 29 April, 2011

Author: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

Bench: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

                              ITAT No. 107 of 2011
                              GA No. 1157 of 2011

                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                        Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
                                 ORIGINAL SIDE


            COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-III, KOLKATA

                                     Versus

                           COOKME [SPICE] PVT. LTD.


For Appellant ;   Mr. S.N.Dutt and Ms. S. Das De, Advocates


BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE BHATTACHARYA

The Hon'ble JUSTICE DR. SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI

Date : 29th April, 2011.

                   This appeal will be heard on the following substantial question

  of law:

                  " Whether the learned Tribunal below committed substantial error

  of law in not applying the provisions, contained in Section 269 SS and Section

  209 T of the Income Tax Act, to the fact of the present case simply because the

  parties are two sister concerns by overlooking the first proviso to the said

  section where sister concerns do not come within the exception."

                  Let notice of this appeal be served by the department on the

  respondent on usual course.

Let requisite number of informal paper book containing all relevant papers used before the authority below be filed within two months from date. In default, the appeal will stand dismissed. 2

Liberty to mention after filing of paper book for inclusion in the hearing list.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(BHATTACHARYA, J.) (DR. SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI, J.) sm AR[CR]