Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vinayak Shridhar Rathod vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 14 November, 2022

Author: Vibha Kankanwadi

Bench: Dipankar Datta, Vibha Kankanwadi

                                                             wp1606.21.odt

adb
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 1606 OF 2021


       Vinayak s/o Shridhar Rathod             ... PETITIONER

                VERSUS

       The State of Maharashtra & others        ... RESPONDENTS


       Mr. C. V. Dharurkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
       Mr. A. R. Kale, A. G. P. for Respondent No.1.
       Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr. S. G.
       Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
       Mr. P. D. Bachate, Advocate for Respondents No. 3 & 4.
       Mr. Swapnil Patunkar, advocate i/by J. P. Legal Associates
       for Respondent No.5.


                         CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND
                                 SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2022. P. C. :

1 Appointment of the respondent no.5 on the post of Assistant Professor in Political Science, on the basis of selection made by a duly constituted Committee in which the Registrar of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad was a member in the capacity of nominee of the Vice Chancellor, is under challenge in this writ petition basically on the ground that the respondent no.5 did not register for the Ph. D. program prior to July 2011 and, therefore, could not have ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 15/11/2022 22:04:44 ::: wp1606.21.odt been granted exemption from the requirement of NET/SLET/SET qualifcation for appointment. 2 Let the relevant records of the Committee's deliberations leading to appointment of the respondent no.5 be placed before us on 16 th November, 2022 by the concerned respondents, i.e., by the respondent no.2 represented by learned advocate Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, and by the respondents 3 & 4, represented by Mr. P. D. Bachate, learned advocate.

(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) ::: Uploaded on - 14/11/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 15/11/2022 22:04:44 :::