Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 10]

Bombay High Court

Dinesh Lodha Huf vs Meeta Rajesh Jain And 2 Ors on 27 April, 2022

Author: A. K. Menon

Bench: A. K. Menon

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                     COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 21 OF 2021


Dinesh Lodha HUF                                           ...       Plaintiff
           vs.
Meeta Rajesh Jain and 2 Ors.                               ...       Defendants


Ms. Sunanda R. Kumbhat, Advocate for Plaintiff.
None for the Defendants.


                                                CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.

DATED : 27th April, 2022 P.C. :

1. The Suit seeks to recover a sum of Rs.1,20,83,673/- along with interest at the rate of 19% p.a. compounded on a quarterly basis. The claim is made on the basis of an agreement under which, money is advanced and agreed to be repaid.
2. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are impleaded on the basis that they have issued some cheques. No decree can be passed for the suit claim against these defendants. The Defendant No.1 alone confirmed liability in writing vide Exhibits H and I. The closing balance is of 31.03.2016. Thereafter, it appears that the cheques have been issued on 19.03.2018 and 05.09.2018. These cheques are said to be issued towards the repayment of the loan. The Defendant No.1 is absent on call. Being a Summary Suit, appearance ought to have been entered within 10 days. The Registry has now confirmed that 1/2 15_COMSS_21_2021.doc Priya Kambli ::: Uploaded on - 29/04/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2022 21:47:54 ::: pursuant to order dated 20.04.2022, they have taken search of the record and found that although Writ of Summons was served, no appearance has been entered. The Plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to proceed ex-parte. Defendant No.1 being absent on call and on instructions of the plaintiff that he does not press the Suit against Defendant Nos.2 and 3, I am of the view that the Suit is liable to be decreed as against Defendant No.1 to the extent of an amount of Rs.79,45,657/- and simple interest at the rate of 12% p.a. Accordingly, the original documents are tendered and taken on file and I pass the following order:
(i) Suit decreed against Defendant No.1 in the aforesaid amount of Rs.79,45,657/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from 04.02.2020 being date of filing the Suit till payment or realisation.
(ii) Suit against Defendant No.2 and 3 is dismissed.
(iii)     Refund, if any, as per Rules.

(iv)      Suit disposed in above terms.

(v)       Draft decree shall be lodged within eight weeks from today.




                                                                       (A. K. MENON, J.)




                                              2/2
15_COMSS_21_2021.doc
Priya Kambli



               ::: Uploaded on - 29/04/2022                    ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2022 21:47:54 :::