Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Mokhtar @ Md. Moktar @ Mokhtar Aali vs The State Of Bihar on 10 November, 2023

Author: Ashutosh Kumar

Bench: Ashutosh Kumar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55499 of 2023

                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2018 Thana- PHULWARIA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Mokhtar @ Md. Moktar @ Mokhtar Aali, Son of Ali Hasan, Resident of
                 Village- Baro, Kadir Chak, P.S.- Phulwaria, Distt. - Begusarai.


                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Ebadur Rahman Shakeb, Adv.
                 For the State           :        Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
                                                  ORAL ORDER


2   10-11-2023

The learned counsel for the parties are present.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Ebadur Rahman Shakeb, the learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below and seek bail.

3. In case the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and seeks bail, the case shall be decided on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55499 of 2023(2) dt.10-11-2023 2/2 its own merits without being prejudiced by the fact that the petitioner earlier was granted anticipatory bail, which bail order he could not take advantage of even after an extension of time was given to him by this Court to surrender before the Court below. It may be noted here that when a second extension petition was filed, the same was rejected by this Court but giving liberty to him to surrender before the Court below.

4. Instead of surrendering before the Court below and seeking bail, the petitioner again moved the Court below for grant of anticipatory bail, which has been rejected.

5. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted to the petitioner to surrender and pray for regular bail.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/-

U       T