Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Sunita Kumari vs Forest Wildlife Department on 23 January, 2019

                                के ीय सूचना आयोग
                          Central Information Commission
                             बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका
                           Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                           नई द ली, New Delhi - 110067

File No: CIC/FWDEP/A/2018/610086/SD

Sunita Kumari                                              ....अपीलकता/Appellant
                                       VERSUS
                                        बनाम
CPIO,
Department of Forest & Wildlife
Chandigarh Administration
Paryavaran Bhawan (2nd Floor)
Sec-19-B, Madhya Marg
Chandigarh-160019                                     ... ितवादीगण /Respondent

 RTI application filed on          :    11/08/2017
 CPIO replied on                   :    11/09/2017 & 05/12/2017
 First appeal filed on             :    30/09/2017
 First Appellate Authority order   :    21/11/2017
 Second Appeal dated               :    12/12/2017
 Date of Hearing                   :    21/01/2019
 Date of Decision                  :    21/01/2019

Information sought

:

The Appellant sought certain clarifications regarding Ex-serviceman Forester's appointment on Contract basis since 2015.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present:-
Appellant: Not present.
1
Respondent: Dr. Abdul Quyoom, Dy Conservator (Forests) & CPIO, Department of Forests & Wildlife, Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh preset through VC.
CPIO submitted that appropriate reply has been provided to the Appellant.
Decision Commission has gone through the case records and observes that appropriate reply has been provided to the Appellant by the CPIO leaving no scope of intervention at this stage.
Commission upholds the submission of the CPIO. No further action lies.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िस हा ) Information Commissioner ( सूचना आयु ) Authenticated true copy (अ भ मा णत स या पत त) Haro Prasad Sen Dy. Registrar 011-26106140 / [email protected] हरो साद सेन, उप-पंजीयक दनांक / Date 2